Sleepy and unemployment.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Charles, the cost of energy is a global phenomenon, and any action the Biden or any other administration might take that affect it border on the trivial. Do this hypothetical exercise. Let's say that Biden's radical liberal sooooocialist policies have created 8% inflation, are solely responsible for it, and otherwise, inflation would be zero and everything would be unicorns and rainbows. Now factor in that the US is 5% of the world's economy.

 

Multiply .05 by .08.

 

You now have the number representing the effect of the Biden administration's maximum effect on global inflation.


Domestic supply / reserves have been derailed, through both direct and artificial constraints. I won't defend our oil/gas industry's behind- the -scenes actions, either; those guys love high energy prices. If you disagree with the assertion that the current administration has turned the spicket off and that those actions have caused significant price increases domestically, I can list a few non-partisan article links with a bunch of bar graphs and sloped lines to support it. In the end , we're just going to disagree that this administration has squelched our assorted domestic subsets of energy resources..and the resultant higher costs are being felt by consumers in a significant way..more significant than your above math problem would suggest,imo.

 

It's OK we disagree..we can both vote, though.   

bar graphs dont show causation.   And neither do any of your posts.   

 

But thanks for stopping by,.

Originally posted by: PJ Stroh

bar graphs dont show causation.   And neither do any of your posts.   

 

But thanks for stopping by,.


Yeah,well..whatever..*l*

Originally posted by: Charles Higgins

Domestic supply / reserves have been derailed, through both direct and artificial constraints. I won't defend our oil/gas industry's behind- the -scenes actions, either; those guys love high energy prices. If you disagree with the assertion that the current administration has turned the spicket off and that those actions have caused significant price increases domestically, I can list a few non-partisan article links with a bunch of bar graphs and sloped lines to support it. In the end , we're just going to disagree that this administration has squelched our assorted domestic subsets of energy resources..and the resultant higher costs are being felt by consumers in a significant way..more significant than your above math problem would suggest,imo.

 

It's OK we disagree..we can both vote, though.   


"Derailed" is a terrible metaphor for the current supply situation. That implies cessation rather then the actuality of a slowdown.

 

What annoys me is how the fossil fuel companies are making unprecedented record profits but have somehow managed to get all the talking heads to blame Biden for the prices THEY charge at the pump. That's quite an achievement, considering the breathtaking idiocy of that contention.


Originally posted by: PJ Stroh

bar graphs dont show causation.   And neither do any of your posts.   

 

But thanks for stopping by,.


If you'll assure me that your response to said article links and anecdotal 'proof' won't be a complete and total waste of my time to collate and present here, I'll do it. In almost all cases, others that lean conservative in here have presented numerous links concerning numerous issues that your side has largely ignored and refuted despite any true veracity. At the same time, I'll try and limit these article links to nonpartisan sources, which in and of itself is quite a task these days. So..?

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

"Derailed" is a terrible metaphor for the current supply situation. That implies cessation rather then the actuality of a slowdown.

 

What annoys me is how the fossil fuel companies are making unprecedented record profits but have somehow managed to get all the talking heads to blame Biden for the prices THEY charge at the pump. That's quite an achievement, considering the breathtaking idiocy of that contention.


Derailed might have been inappropriately applied..conversely, the 'slowdown' you alluded to was more significant than you'd likely ever agree to. And, believe it or not, most of the CEO's of the oil / gas companies piss me off too, and often represent a proverbial snake in the weeds the consumer has to deal with. I won't deny that.

Originally posted by: Charles Higgins

If you'll assure me that your response to said article links and anecdotal 'proof' won't be a complete and total waste of my time to collate and present here, I'll do it. In almost all cases, others that lean conservative in here have presented numerous links concerning numerous issues that your side has largely ignored and refuted despite any true veracity. At the same time, I'll try and limit these article links to nonpartisan sources, which in and of itself is quite a task these days. So..?


I always take non-partisan sources seriously.     Frankly, they are rarely presented here from anyone on your side of the aisle....or those articles end up not claiming what the poster says they claim.  But I would be delighted to see some non-partisan, fact based evidence that Joe Biden's administration bares serious blame for oil supply constraints.

 

Keep in mind US oil supply has grown by 700BPD this year and next year estimates are for all time record output.  But hey - I dont want to spoil your information release.

Originally posted by: Charles Higgins

Derailed might have been inappropriately applied..conversely, the 'slowdown' you alluded to was more significant than you'd likely ever agree to. And, believe it or not, most of the CEO's of the oil / gas companies piss me off too, and often represent a proverbial snake in the weeds the consumer has to deal with. I won't deny that.


Then you're probably as indignant as I am at the zero blame placed on their heads for high prices. The trouble I have with your side is how utterly willing the "party of big business" is to give big corporations a free pass on, well, everything. Including taxes btw.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now