So True

 I see it here all the time -

Ditto that, David, except it goes both ways. 

Silly.  Just make an arguement without the insults, folks.

Candy

  Stating facts is not and will never be considered an argument - the truth IS the truth.

Depends upon who's "facts" are being stated.  

Cogent arguements without insults are an endangered species here.

   "Depends upon who's "facts" are being stated." - I was remiss, apparently I should have stated " truthful, unequivocal, undeniable, indisputable, incontrovertible, unquestionably proven.

A cogent arguement should include facts as you describe.   

Again, even a cogent opinion without insults carries more credibility than a chest beating, see it my way or the highway demand that the chest beater be agreed with.  Nobody has to agree with anybody's side/opinion, but state that side without insults.

Candy

  Where was the insult? The facts are seen everyday. And you are right about who one agrees with - I don't agree with you constantly making excuses for those who do you deem as being wronged. Face it, your bleeding heart and excuse making for those who constantly do wrong is why this kind of behavior continues and esculates. It is obvious that you are unable to accept that there are evil people in this world who have no concern who they take advandage of as they wreck havoc with others. Also, telling and pointing out the factual truth is not an insult. I get it, you don't like my way of exposing and telling the truth. Look around, open your eyes and ask yourself if what you see is right - or wrong. Quit making excuses - there are no excuses for those who are evil. 

Candy, you're learning the futility of interacting with Miller. He LUVVVVS to label whatever opinion he scraped up from the Internet as THE TRUTH. That's so lame; so weak.

God forbid you should challenge him! All you got was insults and weaseling.

And while most of us have had no qualms about insulting him, you never have. You, in fact, have treated him with a civility he doesn't deserve. And how does he respond? He shits on you.

This is low, even for him.

  I KNEW YOU would not miss the opportunity to insert your patronizing assholery concerning my response to Candy. You, of all people, have no concept of the truth and are known to insult any and all who don't agree with your twisted postings and lies. As far as being "low" - that is where you live.

I suppose I often get misinterpreted in what I post.  Too bad.  I've actually been on his side a number of times, including the above post he so vehemently objected to and fired insults back at me for.   Oh, well, I don't live and die by LVA posts from anybody.

Kevin, you know that I have often chastized you in Kitchen Sink, but you always take it well and you reply in a manner to help/make me understand your side without insulting me.  And I appreciate your restraint in doing so.

Candy