I suspect Maxwell is guilty. The restaurant owner is now hated by Liberals for stated that the woman is due a fair trial. Do these Liberal believe that she's not due a fair trial, or do they hate the business owner for telling the truth? It's one or the other, and I'm curious which PJ believes that it is.
The business owner said "We should not rush to judgement". To which I say, "Why not?" Boilerman just judged in his last post. Public opinion has seen the evidence and rendered a non-legaling binding verdict that Boilerman agrees with but the business owner does not. I believe that is what people object to.
There is no open debate as to whether Maxwell will get a fair trial and it certainly is not dependant upon the blessing of a restaurant owner.
As for me personally, Its not something I would boycott over.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
I suspect Maxwell is guilty. The restaurant owner is now hated by Liberals for stated that the woman is due a fair trial. Do these Liberal believe that she's not due a fair trial, or do they hate the business owner for telling the truth? It's one or the other, and I'm curious which PJ believes that it is.
It's a childish trick, and not original at all, to ask a question like "Is it A or B?" when both A and B are bullshit.
It's also pretty childish to pretend that you know how other people think when you have no information.
It's extremely childish to spell simple words such as "liberals" incorrectly.
PJ, you shouldn't bother discussing anything with Boiler the child.
Photograph of actual people who hate due process.
PJ, most people consider a "rush to judgement" as the act of coming to a definitive conclusion with limited or potentially tainted informtation. Do you remember the black stripper who claimed that she was a victim of mass rape at the Duke fraternity? How many Liberals rushed to judgement before it was confirmed that she was lying? After all, being a black woman, Liberals had to make their position heard, calling for the fraternity be closed down without due process. They also chastised those who asked for all the evidence to be heard before throwing these young men out of school.
You've already agreed on this thread with the same "rushed judgement" of Maxwell you ridicule liberals for having. Hello !
But Another example would be when people like you called Hillary CLinton a crook for 2 years despite the fact she was never charged with a crime let alone convicted of one. Which group was the "lock her up" chant coming from? The same one being led by the man you voted for president.
And then there's the photo from above.
You're honestly lecturing about Lib's disposition towards governing due process in the same year your group tried to overthrow the government because they didnt like the election results?
thanks for stopping by,
Ah, the old change the subject tactic. Usually it takes Kevin to do this.
OK then.
In SUmmary, Liberals rush to judgement when they agree with Boilerman about Maxwell's guilt.
But Boileman did not rush to judgement by calling Hillary CLinton a crook without a charge, verdict, or any evidence.
thanks for stopping by
I believe that the subject is about Liberals boycotting a man's business because he believes people should know the facts before coming to a conclusion and for also believing that Amerians are due a fair trial.
This is lunacy, or should I say Liberalism in America today. You guys have come full circle, including many Liberal arguing against free speech.
Boiler argues like a child. A child with severe cognitive deficits.
