PJ says-"Stone colluded with Russia on behalf of the Trump campaign. He was the bridge. And then he lied about to the Mueller investigation" ----------- What page(s) was this found in the Mueller report? Or are you making stuff up again to suit your personal beliefs? -- Please name the "other convictred scumbags in Trump's circle of thugs" who have been pardoned.
Originally posted by: David Miller
PJ says-"Stone colluded with Russia on behalf of the Trump campaign. He was the bridge. And then he lied about to the Mueller investigation" ----------- What page(s) was this found in the Mueller report? Or are you making stuff up again to suit your personal beliefs? -- Please name the "other convictred scumbags in Trump's circle of thugs" who have been pardoned.
Thats the part of the Mueller report that was redacted. But we now know it with the verdict in Roger Stone's trial. Cause thats what he was found guilty of. But you wont learn that from watching Hnanity, David.
What else can I help with today?
(FYi - they're having a sale at Walgreens !)
END OF THREAD.
PJ, there's no room in Stalker's ass for those suppositories--both his head and Sean Hannity are up there already.
"Thats the part of the Mueller report that was redacted."
If it is redacted, how do you know what it says?
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
Stone colluded with Russia on behalf of the Trump campaign. He was the bridge. And then he lied about to the Mueller investigation.
But he'll get pardoned along with the other convictred scumbags in Trump's circle of thugs. watch
Actually this is completely false. NO AMERICAN WAS EVER CHARGED, TRIED OR CONVICTED of colluding with Russia to influence the 2016 elections. No American was claimed to have colluded with Russia in the Mueller report. That is the Russia hoax that PJ is perpetuating.
Stone was charged and convicted of lying to congress about knowing in advance about Wikileaks plans to realease the DNC's hacked e-mails. That has nothing to do with 'colluding with Russia'. If he was smarter, he simply would have answered 'I don't recall'....Like Hillary did for 21 of 25 questions in her testimony about destruction of e-mails....or better yet, he could have just told the truth as knowing in advance about Wikileaks trove of data is not illegal.
Originally posted by: Charles
Actually this is completely false. NO AMERICAN WAS EVER CHARGED, TRIED OR CONVICTED of colluding with Russia to influence the 2016 elections. No American was claimed to have colluded with Russia in the Mueller report. That is the Russia hoax that PJ is perpetuating.
Stone was charged and convicted of lying to congress about knowing in advance about Wikileaks plans to realease the DNC's hacked e-mails. That has nothing to do with 'colluding with Russia'. If he was smarter, he simply would have answered 'I don't recall'....Like Hillary did for 21 of 25 questions in her testimony about destruction of e-mails....or better yet, he could have just told the truth as knowing in advance about Wikileaks trove of data is not illegal.
You must not have read the report. It stated unequivocally, multiple times, that such collusion had taken place. The investigation was unable to determine who instigated it (from the US side). The report specifically stated that such determination was impeded by Trump's multiple acts of obstruction of justice.
In other words, the report said that there was indeed collusion but that Trump had successfully interfered with the investigation, to the point where the origin of that collusion couldn't be determined.
It's obvious that you Trumpers are all just fine with Trump's obstruction of justice. Imagine if Obama had done that! You would all be running around the barnyard, squawking your heads off.
Originally posted by: tom
"Thats the part of the Mueller report that was redacted."
If it is redacted, how do you know what it says?
You have to learn to read, Tom. He said that the Stone conviction was based on information from the Mueller report--information that was redacted from the version released to the general public. It was withheld in order not to compromise the criminal proceedings against Stone.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
You must not have read the report. It stated unequivocally, multiple times, that such collusion had taken place. The investigation was unable to determine who instigated it (from the US side). The report specifically stated that such determination was impeded by Trump's multiple acts of obstruction of justice.
In other words, the report said that there was indeed collusion but that Trump had successfully interfered with the investigation, to the point where the origin of that collusion couldn't be determined.
It's obvious that you Trumpers are all just fine with Trump's obstruction of justice. Imagine if Obama had done that! You would all be running around the barnyard, squawking your heads off.
"It stated unequivocally, multiple times, that such collusion had taken place"
Pure bullshit.
Allreighty then, Mr. "I read the report". I dare you to quote DIRECTLY FROM THE Mueller REPORT one time where where it actually claims Collusion between Russia and Trump or the Trump campaign or any American had taken place.
I don't think you read the report.
I said that the report found that collusion had taken place but they couldn't pin it on Trump.
Do you find it strange that Trump committed eight acts of obstruction of justice to impede the investigation? Those are not the actions of an innocent man (or, possibly, the actions of an innocent but extremely stupid man).
