Strzok Owns Trey Gowdy

He really lit Gowdy's ass on fire. Then he pounded Trump for his disgusting behavior. 

 

 

Video

 

Edited on Jul 12, 2018 12:47pm

Let's see now- who wrote the texts that are in question? Was it Goudy, or President Trump? No, it was this liar who is just trying to cover his ass by deflecting what he did. That is the real "disgusting behavior" that has transpired here.

He refused to answer the question on why he was kicked off and sent to work in some non-job.

 

In mark's distorted view of life, this is somehow a success

All of the Bengazhi crybabies are livid Strzok won't reveal confidential information from an ongoing investigation.    (keep in mind these are the same people that allowed Steve Bannon to not answer any questions despite having no grounds to do so)

 

But they did their job.  The cast of Deliverence shit their pants on national TV to impress their condeferate flag waiving base.    Louie Gohmert devolved so far as to insult the man's relationship with his wife.  If the hearing devolved any further it would have been a series of yo-mama jokes.   

 

This is what Republicans are doing in COngress while our president goes to Europe to ruin our relationship with NATO countries.    Congratualtions.

Edited on Jul 12, 2018 8:13pm

 PJ you missed your calling - you should be working for CNN, with the rest of the idiots.

I just love listening to lefties trying to rewrite history.  Their hatred of this President just makes my day!  Thanks Mark and PJ for brightening my day.  Now since you have nothing else, let the name calling begin.

Peter wouldn’t answer why he was fired from the investigation - not really top secret stuff

 

peter did a good job of insulting his wife

No Tom the trained lawyer, Trey Gowdy, was using your and your ilks lack of legal knowledge to intentionally mislead you.  Generally, in these types of matters, there are two types of bias. 1.  Actual bias where you act on your bias to the detriment of somebody else.  2. The appearance of bias where your personal interests create an appearance of bias even though there is none.  For attorneys, these things are covered by the rules of professional conduct in whatever state they are admitted to.  For government employees, there are state/federal rules of conduct or the agency in question has their own rules of professional conduct.

 

Gowdy was intentionally attempting to conflate the two to make you and your ilk think Strzok had acted with actual bias when he knows the difference as an attorney. You and your ilk ate it up and praised Gowdy for lying to you and the rest of the county. 

 

If Gowdy would have attempted to present a matter of law this way in a courtroom when he was serving as a prosecutor, he would have likely been disbarred. He can get away with misrepresenting the law here because Congress is a political arena, not a legal one.

 

Edited on Jul 13, 2018 3:35pm

Peter Strozk’s text message exchange with alleged paramour Lisa Page. The two high-level FBI officials were discussing their investigations and the 2016 presidential campaign: 

 

PAGE: “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” 

 

 STRZOK: “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.” 

 

Even a trained legal aide like yourself should see that is a biased statement.  If he wasn't biased, why was he removed?

 

A "trained lawyer"? Does that mean you have been trained to mislead, twist and flat out lie when voicing your "facts"? That explains everything...

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now