Tax Returns

Originally posted by: David Miller

  You have a lot of nerve talking about anyone else, - asshole way in which you responded to him - considering you have done just that for years here in the Forums.


Predictable. You know I'm right, so your "defense" is to counterattack. Your behavior to Max was horrible. Period. It has nothing to do with me.

 

Rather than have the balls and the decency to admit you're wrong...we got what we expected from you. This is why everybody loathes you. And attack me all you want; it won't change a thing about you.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Predictable. You know I'm right, so your "defense" is to counterattack. Your behavior to Max was horrible. Period. It has nothing to do with me.

 

Rather than have the balls and the decency to admit you're wrong...we got what we expected from you. This is why everybody loathes you. And attack me all you want; it won't change a thing about you.


 Trying to deflect and turn the tables on me will not work - you past history of 7+ years of dispicable behavior speaks to who you are and forever will be. You are and have been the most loathsome individual that has ever posted here in the Forums. As I previously stated, Max and others will make up their own minds concerning the topics posted here and who to believe and who not to believe. 

Kevin and others here complain when David links from Facebook to a NY Times or the Wallstreet Journal article.  They claim that because an Wallstreet Journal article was linked via Facebook, this link makes the legitimate article worthless.

 

I struggle to follow this logic.

Edited on Apr 23, 2024 11:22am
Originally posted by: Boilerman

Kevin and others here complain when David links from Facebook to a NY Times or the Wallstreet Journal article.  They claim that because an Wallstreet Journal article was linked via Facebook, this link makes the legitimate article worthless.

 

I struggle to follow this logic.


  There is no "logic" - this is their way of dismissing links that factually dispute the lies these liars post. I will continue to post the truth, no matter the source - and me doing so just galls these liars.


Beacause David doesn't actually read the NY Times or the Wallstreet Journal articles.  All he reads before he posts it here is the untruthful and inflammatory summary of the article written by some conservative Facebook rando. I have actually read quite a few of his links. When you do what you find out is that the summaries David posts are usually quite a bit different than what the actual article says.

 

And if you point that out to David,  it becomes clear he hasn't read the article in question. As a result, I don't waste my time on them.

Edited on Apr 23, 2024 4:56pm
Originally posted by: Mark

Beacause David doesn't actually read the NY Times or the Wallstreet Journal articles.  All he reads before he posts it here is the untruthful and inflammatory summary of the article written by some conservative Facebook rando. I have actually read quite a few of his links. When you do what you find out is that the summaries David posts are usually quite a bit different than what the actual article says. And if you point that out David,  it becomes clear he hasn't read the article in question. As a result, I don't waste my time on them.


 The real reason you say you don't waste time on what I post (which is a lie) is because you can't accept the truth of what I post. The Times and the Journal have been proven wrong so many times that fact checkers have lost count.

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Kevin and others here complain when David links from Facebook to a NY Times or the Wallstreet Journal article.  They claim that because an Wallstreet Journal article was linked via Facebook, this link makes the legitimate article worthless.

 

I struggle to follow this logic.


Boiler, logic truly is not your strong suit.

 

If David wanted his shit to sound authentic, he'd link to a legit news source--EVERY TIME. He only did so because we told him for the 1000th time that Facebook isn't a news source.

 

But he didn't make his post to prove anything about rents. It was just Part 578 of his Bitch About California series 

Originally posted by: David Miller

 Trying to deflect and turn the tables on me will not work - you past history of 7+ years of dispicable behavior speaks to who you are and forever will be. You are and have been the most loathsome individual that has ever posted here in the Forums. As I previously stated, Max and others will make up their own minds concerning the topics posted here and who to believe and who not to believe. 


Max has already decided, as thousands have, not to talk to you. The TROOTINESS of your posts has nothing to do with those decisions.

 

Do you even realize how stupidly pompous you sound when you honk, "I will continue to post THE TRUTH" (Facebook videos)?

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now