Originally posted by: Edso
That is a good one, actually. Well played, Live.
Haha. I wish I could take credit for it. Can't remember where I first heard it.
Originally posted by: Edso
That is a good one, actually. Well played, Live.
Haha. I wish I could take credit for it. Can't remember where I first heard it.
Well, the government (Federal, state or local) has no business defining any illness. Once again, doesn't this seem familiar? A government inventing a new mental illness that's defined by only one symptom, dissent against the government. Read about "sluggish schizophrenia" in the Soviet Union.
Originally posted by: jstewa22
Well, the government (Federal, state or local) has no business defining any illness. Once again, doesn't this seem familiar? A government inventing a new mental illness that's defined by only one symptom, dissent against the government. Read about "sluggish schizophrenia" in the Soviet Union.
And we're pretty damn close to people being dragged off to mental institutions for suffering from the illness of dissenting with Dear Leader Comrade Trump.
Originally posted by: jstewa22
Well, the government (Federal, state or local) has no business defining any illness. Once again, doesn't this seem familiar? A government inventing a new mental illness that's defined by only one symptom, dissent against the government. Read about "sluggish schizophrenia" in the Soviet Union.
This mental illness is not new - Trump Derangement Syndrome (Political Term): This is a derogatory, non-clinical term first adapted for Donald Trump during his 2017–2021 presidency. It originated from "Bush Derangement Syndrome," coined in 2003 by columnist Charles Krauthammer.--- Minnesota is just incorporating it into the state's legal definition through amended statutes
Originally posted by: David Miller
This mental illness is not new - Trump Derangement Syndrome (Political Term): This is a derogatory, non-clinical term first adapted for Donald Trump during his 2017–2021 presidency. It originated from "Bush Derangement Syndrome," coined in 2003 by columnist Charles Krauthammer.--- Minnesota is just incorporating it into the state's legal definition through amended statutes
The definition you provide states that it is NOT a mental illness ("non-clinical term"); it states that it is a political term.
Minnesota is NOT incorporating the term into its statutes. A couple of MAGA assholes are sponsoring such a bill, but it has zero chance of passing.
So, you LIED LIED LIED as well as contradicted yourself twice in one short post. Not a record for you, though.
Originally posted by: LiveFreeNW
Haha. I wish I could take credit for it. Can't remember where I first heard it.
I like to think of it as Turd Dies Soon.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
I like to think of it as Turd Dies Soon.
Actually a more appropiate definition should be - Typical DemocRAT Stupidity.
Originally posted by: jstewa22
Well, the government (Federal, state or local) has no business defining any illness. Once again, doesn't this seem familiar? A government inventing a new mental illness that's defined by only one symptom, dissent against the government. Read about "sluggish schizophrenia" in the Soviet Union.
I wonder if MAGA morons like Miller even realize that labeling dissent against the ruling government as a mental disease was used in Stalin's Russia as a pretext to drag tens of millions of people, most of whom never returned, to gulags?
It's puzzling. All the MAGA rhetoric is that they're anti-COMMIE. So why are they using one of the most awful propaganda terms from the COMMIE era to demonize the people they disagree with...and try to justify their persecution?
I can't believe that anyone in their right mind would ever introduce such a bill. I mean, talk about exposing yourself as nothing more than a servile Trump appendage! MAGAs are fascists, but usually not as blatantly as this!
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
I wonder if MAGA morons like Miller even realize that labeling dissent against the ruling government as a mental disease was used in Stalin's Russia as a pretext to drag tens of millions of people, most of whom never returned, to gulags?
It's puzzling. All the MAGA rhetoric is that they're anti-COMMIE. So why are they using one of the most awful propaganda terms from the COMMIE era to demonize the people they disagree with...and try to justify their persecution?
I can't believe that anyone in their right mind would ever introduce such a bill. I mean, talk about exposing yourself as nothing more than a servile Trump appendage! MAGAs are fascists, but usually not as blatantly as this!
Another example of Typical DemocRAT Stupidity.
Originally posted by: David Miller
Another example of Typical DemocRAT Stupidity.
That all you got?
