Speaks for itself....

Speaks for itself....

Wish I could upvote you as I can on Breitbart.
And its probably a soybean farmer.
It's a perfect Stalker source, in that it contains one of his signature misspellings.
Liberalism...............It's all about Money for nothing and the shit for free.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Liberalism...............It's all about Money for nothing and the shit for free.
That's such a stupid and common conservative trope, and utterly untrue. You keep saying it, but it's bullshit nonetheless. The "free shit" isn't free. It's paid for by taxes.
I guess you object to children, the elderly, the disabled, etc. etc. getting "free shit" like food, clothing, and shelter. When you had a child, did you look down at her in her crib and say, "No more free baby food for you unless you go out and get a job"?
Liberalism is about, among other things, redistributing wealth to make sure that people don't starve, die of a treatable medical condition, or freeze to death. Yeah, that costs money. So what? Is letting people die a preferable alternative? I know that for most conservatives, the answer to that question is "Hell, yeah!" I can't get on board with that--but obviously, you can.
Shouldn't it be "chick", . . . not "chic" ?
Originally posted by: Don
Shouldn't it be "chick", . . . not "chic" ?
That's the Stalker-style misspelling I was referring to. I think he truly didn't understand the error. He's kind of sic that way.
"Free shit" is that which is not paid for.
good example - Da Wall ! And everything else encompassed by the 750 billion of defict added since Trump took office.
bad example = Obamacare whose payment mechanisms went beyond its price tag and reduced the deficit
Can you guess which examples Boilerman embraces and objects to?
ood example - Da Wall ! And everything else encompassed by the 750 billion of defict added since Trump took office. - COSTS HAVE INCREASED AT A FASTER RATER THAN REVENUE GROWTH. THE BIGGEST DRIVER TO THE DEFICIT IS SOCIAL SPENDING. NEITHER PARTY HAS ANY INTEREST IN REDUCING THE DEFICIT.
bad example = Obamacare whose payment mechanisms went beyond its price tag and reduced the deficit - OBAMACARE TAXES KICKED IN PRIOR TO THE EXPENSES OF THE PROGRAM; SO IT REALLY DIDN'T REDUCE THE DEFICIT