Trump invades Venezuela with ground troops

It's stupid and hypocritical of you to object to unlawful actions by Democrat leaders but not to the same actions by Trump. Instead, you cheer and lick his balls.

LiveFree was honest with you and voiced an honorable and correct point of view--thst an unconstitutional action is wrong and unlawful whether it's "our guy" or "their guy" that does it. 

Do you REALLY think that just because other Presidents have violated the Constitution, that it's all right for Trump to do so?

Wrong is wrong. Unlawful is unlawful. The actions of one person do not excuse the actions of another.

Period.

So what? Schumer didn't say that Trump should invade Venezuela and kidnap Maduro.

Ole Chuck the scmuck Schumer basically lost all credibility to me decades ago when he tried to claim that flash bang gernades can't kill, injure, or maime and that anyone that says otherwise doesn't know anything about them. (During the Waco Hearings) 

Miller has a bizarre and rather disturbing hard-on for Schumer. It isn't because of anything Schumer said or did, then or now. It's because he's repeatedly criticized and opposed Trump, which in the eyes of MAGA is the worst crime a person can commit. And keep in mind that MAGA approves of rape, pedophilia, and murder. In their minds, all that is OK but saying bad things about Trump is not.

The Waco wackos likely did a Jim Jones Kool-aid on themselves at the orders of their kookoobird leader. The government also fucked up in that they shouldn't have applied overwhelming force. The hearings were a farce as a result. Everybody there was culpable.

 Screwmer's actions - past and present - speak for themselves, no matter who comments about them. All of your off topic bloviating does not change what he said and did.

And what he said and did is utterly irrelevant to the legality or advisibilily of Trump's actions. Talk about being off-topic!

  This lady is talking directly to you Lewis  --- https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=878926928303802

I would think not. In fact doing so would be arguably unconstitutional.  Congress would declare the war, and then the executive would execute the war.  Seperation of powers. 

You have made an argument that there was no time to get Congressional approval due to a necessity of speed and stealth for an operation to capture him. Do you make the same argument about a continued occupation? Seems to me at this point the cat is out of the bag and the need for speed and stealth is over. Is the administration seeking Congressional approval for the occupation? Should they?

There are no US troops in Venezuela.  They withdrew after capturing maduro.

Delcy Rodriguez is the interim president until there is an election

In fact doing so would be arguably unconstitutional

That would not stop democrats from slowing down the process

The question was whether the Turd will seek Congressional approval for the military occupation and looting of Venezuela. Of course he won't. He didn't seek it for the invasion and kidnapping.

Democrats oppose the unlawful, illegal, and immoral invasion of Venezuela. Republicans should, too. But they're in thrall to their master, the Turd.

Just like you are, stupid Tom.