Trump is incredibly dumb or senile

Originally posted by: David Miller

  President Trump implemented tariffs for the purpose of balancing trade- and tariffs - between America and other world nations- nations that have unfarily tariffed America for years/decades. The results have been amazing with present/future job creation, manufacturing and revenue generated from the tariffs. Now YOU and Mark consider his implemention of tariffs as being "dumb". Care to explain/define the "dumb" part of your answer? 


I'm simply answering Mark's question.  Is Trump dumb or senile?  He is dumb.  Just watch any speech or public appearance he makes and draw your own conclusion.  

 

And what is worse, he is the worst kind of dumb.  An arrogant guy that thinks he is smart but is actually dumb.  

Originally posted by: Jerry Ice 33

I'm simply answering Mark's question.  Is Trump dumb or senile?  He is dumb.  Just watch any speech or public appearance he makes and draw your own conclusion.  

 

And what is worse, he is the worst kind of dumb.  An arrogant guy that thinks he is smart but is actually dumb.  


   I see you avoided my question. Apparently your hatred and jealously override what he has accomplished for Americans and America. But you know, your misguided hatred will not change the fact that he has almost 3 more years of making America great - which is happening every day. 

Originally posted by: David Miller

   I see you avoided my question. Apparently your hatred and jealously override what he has accomplished for Americans and America. But you know, your misguided hatred will not change the fact that he has almost 3 more years of making America great - which is happening every day. 


I don't like tarriffs at all.  On either side.  Two wrongs don't make a right.  

 

Now answer my question, David.  Do you think Trump is smart?

Originally posted by: Jerry Ice 33

I don't like tarriffs at all.  On either side.  Two wrongs don't make a right.  

 

Now answer my question, David.  Do you think Trump is smart?


 Well the other nations tariff America. What is America supposed to do, just keep paying them? Not liking tariffs is one thing, allowing other nations to take advantage of America is another. So, just how would you handle the tariff  situation? President Trump is very smart. It is those who can not see the whole picture that considers him dumb. I know that you will consider my answer as wrong - but then again, I don't measure a persons mentality by what others who hate him say - I judge a persons mentality by what they do and accomplish. 


Originally posted by: David Miller

 Well the other nations tariff America. What is America supposed to do, just keep paying them?.........


Is that how you think tariffs work? When The US puts a tariff on Canadian goods you think Canada pays? 

Originally posted by: LiveFreeNW

Is that how you think tariffs work? When The US puts a tariff on Canadian goods you think Canada pays? 


   From Google - Here are the primary positive arguments for enacting tariffs in the US:(1) Protection of Domestic Industries: Tariffs provide a competitive advantage to US companies by raising the price of imported, often lower-cost, goods. This is particularly used to protect strategic sectors like steel, aluminum, and electronics from foreign competition or "dumping" (selling goods below cost).(2) Job Preservation and Creation: By boosting demand for local products, tariffs can help retain or create manufacturing jobs. For instance, tariffs on steel can increase employment within the US steel industry.(3) Generation of Government Revenue: Tariffs function as a tax on imported goods, creating a revenue stream for the federal government. In 2025, U.S. tariffs resulted in over $264 billion in revenue, which can be used to fund government programs.(4)Leverage in Trade Negotiations: Tariffs are used as a tool to pressure other countries to reduce their own trade barriers or to stop unfair trade practices, such as currency manipulation or intellectual property theft.(5) National Security and Supply Chain Resilience: By encouraging domestic production, tariffs can reduce dependence on foreign suppliers for critical goods, such as medical equipment, technology, or materials needed for defense. (6)Correction of Trade Imbalances: Supporters argue that tariffs can address persistent trade deficits—when the US imports more than it exports—by forcing a readjustment in trade flows.(7) Environmental and Labor Standards: Tariffs can be used to hold trading partners accountable for low environmental or labor standards, making goods from countries with lower "high-road" standards more expensive and protecting American companies that abide by stricter regulations

Originally posted by: David Miller

   From Google - Here are the primary positive arguments for enacting tariffs in the US:(1) Protection of Domestic Industries: Tariffs provide a competitive advantage to US companies by raising the price of imported, often lower-cost, goods. This is particularly used to protect strategic sectors like steel, aluminum, and electronics from foreign competition or "dumping" (selling goods below cost).(2) Job Preservation and Creation: By boosting demand for local products, tariffs can help retain or create manufacturing jobs. For instance, tariffs on steel can increase employment within the US steel industry.(3) Generation of Government Revenue: Tariffs function as a tax on imported goods, creating a revenue stream for the federal government. In 2025, U.S. tariffs resulted in over $264 billion in revenue, which can be used to fund government programs.(4)Leverage in Trade Negotiations: Tariffs are used as a tool to pressure other countries to reduce their own trade barriers or to stop unfair trade practices, such as currency manipulation or intellectual property theft.(5) National Security and Supply Chain Resilience: By encouraging domestic production, tariffs can reduce dependence on foreign suppliers for critical goods, such as medical equipment, technology, or materials needed for defense. (6)Correction of Trade Imbalances: Supporters argue that tariffs can address persistent trade deficits—when the US imports more than it exports—by forcing a readjustment in trade flows.(7) Environmental and Labor Standards: Tariffs can be used to hold trading partners accountable for low environmental or labor standards, making goods from countries with lower "high-road" standards more expensive and protecting American companies that abide by stricter regulations


Your AI generated response did not answer my question. 

Originally posted by: LiveFreeNW

Your AI generated response did not answer my question. 


 And you apparently do not comprehend the end result of imposing tariffs. These are the negatives - Increased Consumer Prices: Tariffs commonly lead to higher prices for goods, increasing the cost of living and reducing consumer purchasing power. Higher Costs for Business: Companies that import raw materials or components face higher expenses, which can cause them to raise prices on finished goods or reduce production.--- These are the Positives - Protection for Domestic Industries: By making imported goods more expensive, tariffs can help local manufacturers compete, potentially shielding them from foreign competition. Reduced Trade Volumes: Tariffs are designed to reduce imports, which can lead to a decline in international trade and, sometimes, a narrowing of the trade deficit. Retaliation and Trade Wars: Targeted countries often impose retaliatory tariffs, leading to escalating trade tensions and reduced export opportunities for domestic firms. Government Revenue Generation: Tariffs generate revenue for the government, with recent studies showing significant income collected from importers. - the overall effect is to balance trade, bring jobs and manufacturing back to America, and to rely less on foreign products. These changes do not happen overnight, but when in place, America sees long term benefits. 

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

I have three long-time friends who work there--two in the pit and one in security. They told me of "an old guy from Texas" who is a frequent visitor and has been thrown out multiple times for abusive behavior toward both the dealers and his fellow players. 

 

As Miller always announces his trips, I've asked them if that person was there during those times. They've always coincided.

 

That is only circumstantial. However, Miller has threatened to find me in Vegas and "teach me a lesson"--multiple times. As I am also a frequent 4Q visitor, I didn't want to take even the negligible risk that he was some crazy who would actually try to find and attack me. So I asked my friends to keep an eye out for "the guy from Texas" and for advice re what I should do if someone threatened me in the casino. They told me once, while I was there, that he was there as well. They also said that due to privacy issues, they couldn't give me his name or a physical description. So I simply stayed away from the pit, and ultimately nothing happened.

 

You don't know the backstory, which was that I had an LVA blog, and I said something mildly disparaging about Trump (it was 2015), and Miller's response was to flood my Comments section with thousands of gibberish posts--daily. It consumed an hour+ of my time every day to take them down. I finally got tired of it and quit. Miller claims that Anthony made me take down the blog. I counter with the offer that if he can get Anthony to confirm that allegation, I'll leave LVA altogether and never return. At that point, Miller becomes strangely silent.

 

So I don't know if the nasty old guy from Texas is him. But I have other confirming info that I can't reveal, because I don't want my friends to get in trouble. 

 

It's certainly at least theoretically possible that Miller is unfailingly polite when he visits the 4Q, and that old nasty guy is someone else. But boy, is he angry when after three or four days in Vegas, he comes to the Sink and starts dozens of threads and screams at everybody.


It would be interesting to hear David's side of the story....

Originally posted by: David Miller

  President Trump implemented tariffs for the purpose of balancing trade- and tariffs - between America and other world nations- nations that have unfarily tariffed America for years/decades. The results have been amazing with present/future job creation, manufacturing and revenue generated from the tariffs. Now YOU and Mark consider his implemention of tariffs as being "dumb". Care to explain/define the "dumb" part of your answer? 


Here's the reality:

 

Almost zero job growth in 2025. Half normal job growth in Jan 2026.

 

Highest rate of manufacturing job layoffs since covid.

 

There is no indication of "future" job growth.

 

The revenue "raised" by tariffs came directly from the pockets of American taxpayers. Ironic, since MAGA always yells at Democrats for raising taxes.

 

It's estimated that the Trump tariffs cost the average American household $1000 in 2025.

 

I don't think we can stand much more of these "amazing" "accomplishments "

 

So yes, quite dumb. Trump truly doesn't understand the most fundamental aspects of how tariffs work: namely, who pays them. He thinks that when he slaps tariffs on Canadian goods, Canada pays them. Dumb!

 

Now scream at me, insult me, call me a liar, etc. etc. That will not change reality.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now