Tulsi is your source? What? Alex jones wasn't available?
have fun with that bullshit. You would think after MAGA conned Tom into believing the Epstein bullshit he might be more skeptical going forward. Nah.
Tulsi is your source? What? Alex jones wasn't available?
have fun with that bullshit. You would think after MAGA conned Tom into believing the Epstein bullshit he might be more skeptical going forward. Nah.
Are our MAGAs so STOOPID that they can't see this is nothing more than crude Trump deflection?
Yes, apparently they are! Stupid Millerscum, stupid Tommie-poo, the rest of the gang...they drank the Kool-aid. Again.
You MAGAS are idiots...and drooling pansies as well.
Declassified govt documents is the source. Try to keep up
And so what stopped Trump from indicting people with them in his first term?
Trump is trying to divert attention away from the Epstein bullshit by inserting another Epstein conspiracy. And Tom the MAGA sucker bought it.
tell us, Tom, when can we expect the indictments? Before or after we see the Epstein black book of pedophiles that doesnt exist?
Originally posted by: tom
Over 100 pages were just declassified that discredits the Russia interference story. pj needs to stay current.
Documents shared by Gabbard's office claimed that before the 2016 election, there was no evidence showing Russia tried to directly alter vote counts
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said the 114 pages of heavily redacted emails reveal that former President Barack Obama’s national security Cabinet faked and manipulated intelligence behind the assessment that Russia wanted Trump to win the election.
"Creating this piece of manufactured intelligence that claims that Russia had helped Donald Trump get elected contradicted every other assessment that had been made previously in the months leading up to the election that said exactly the opposite, that Russia had neither the intent nor the capability to try to ‘hack the United States election,’"
Evidence released by Gabbard's office implicated then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey and former National Security Adviser Susan Rice, among others, in addition to the former president.
Do you think the Senate Intelligence Committee had access to these classified documents when they issued their 5th and final report on Russian interference in the 2016 election?
It's Trump deflecting from the MAGA Epstein hoax that just fell in his lap like a cowpie, classic Trump/MAGA tactics. You have to give him some credit; he knows his MAGA sheep will fall for it every time.
Senate Intelligence Committee issues final report on Russian interference
"“We found irrefutable evidence of Russian meddling,” Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., acting chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a statement, directly refuting President Donald Trump’s repeated assertions that Russian interference was a “hoax” perpetrated by Democrats.
The committee, however, did not find any evidence of a coordinated scheme between the Trump campaign and Moscow, Rubio said.
The nearly 1,000-page report outlines the “breathtaking level of contacts between Trump officials and Russian government operatives that is a very real counterintelligence threat to our elections,” Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., the committee’s top Democrat, said in a statement."
Here's the entire report from the bipartisan committee:
sites-default-files-documents-report-volume5.pdf
Title Page:
"REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE UNITED STATES SENATE ON
RUSSIAN ACTIVE MEASURES CAMPAIGNS AND INTERFERENCE IN THE 2016 U.S. ELECTION
VOLUME 5: COUNTERINTELLIGENCE THREATS AND VULNERABILITIES"
Once again, your links go nowhere. Why bother posting them when they just come back to the same page? You prove nothing but that you don't know how to post links.
I'll save your post to revisit later, not that it matters much, just like boiler and most of MAGA, you're an intellectual pussy.
Originally posted by: tom
Over 100 pages were just declassified that discredits the Russia interference story. pj needs to stay current.
Documents shared by Gabbard's office claimed that before the 2016 election, there was no evidence showing Russia tried to directly alter vote counts
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said the 114 pages of heavily redacted emails reveal that former President Barack Obama’s national security Cabinet faked and manipulated intelligence behind the assessment that Russia wanted Trump to win the election.
"Creating this piece of manufactured intelligence that claims that Russia had helped Donald Trump get elected contradicted every other assessment that had been made previously in the months leading up to the election that said exactly the opposite, that Russia had neither the intent nor the capability to try to ‘hack the United States election,’"
Evidence released by Gabbard's office implicated then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey and former National Security Adviser Susan Rice, among others, in addition to the former president.
Some recent info on the Senate Intelligence Report that I referenced earlier, an article from Washington Examiner. Using your favorite bias anaylizer, Allsides, the Examinder is rated "Lean Right"
Senators stand by Russia election meddling report after Gabbard claims - Washington Examiner
"Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), a longtime leadership adviser and member of the Intel panel, defended the Senate’s previous findings of foreign meddling."
"Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) desired more information from Gabbard and referred to the Intel panel’s yearslong inquiry as “a thorough, in-depth investigation.”
“I don’t know what she’s referring to,” Collins said of Gabbard. “I do know that the intelligence committee did a very thorough, in-depth investigation. But if she has evidence that we did not have access to, I certainly want to see that.”
Gabbard’s office did not respond to a request for comment."
When is Obama getting arrested?
I'm on pins and needles..
But if she has evidence that we did not have access to, I certainly want to see that.”
As Senator Collins said this is new info that was not available to them; which could be a game changer. We shall see
Well that sure deflated pretty fast.
We went from saying
"we're going to prosecute Obama"
to
"we have to read something we havent read to see if there's something in there we need to be upset about."
Trump conned you again.
Originally posted by: tom
But if she has evidence that we did not have access to, I certainly want to see that.”
As Senator Collins said this is new info that was not available to them; which could be a game changer. We shall see
Or it might just be a lot of BS and amount to absolutely nothing. But we all wait with bated breath. SMH
