Tom should be glad to know the Green New Deal's pricetag came down by 98 Trillion dollars from the last debate. Pence said it was 2 trillion...Trump said it was 100 Trillion. They should really figure out their own bullshit number to cry about so they can get their own argument straight.
He was referring to the Harris-Biden plan
No, Tom. He was specifically referring to the Green New Deal. He said so three times. You really should brush up on your comprehension skills.
It's hilarious that Pence and the gang pretend to be outraged and horrified by something that would supposedly cost $2 trillion while barking and honking about Trump's bigly tax cut that cost the government almost the same amount!
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
No, Tom. He was specifically referring to the Green New Deal. He said so three times. You really should brush up on your comprehension skills.
It's hilarious that Pence and the gang pretend to be outraged and horrified by something that would supposedly cost $2 trillion while barking and honking about Trump's bigly tax cut that cost the government almost the same amount!
The suppossed 2 Trillion cost is not from Biden or Harris.
Tom comes on here every now and then and makes up a number that he ascribes to a fictional plan that nobody sponcers but he wants to pretend they do. And then he wants you to defend Democrats against it. Its a fun game they like to play on the short bus....and the WHite House too.
Coming from the guy who just made up a number that Chicago was more dangerous in the 20's.
Om 8/11 Harris/Biden announced their gnd would cost $2t.
Still waiting for pj to show me where is said I am in favor of killing protesters.
Still waiting for mp to post one of my lies.
Tom, now you're just starting to babble.
You don't get to demand anything from anyone here. You forfeited the right to be talked to as a rational human being quite some time ago. So you will be "still waiting" for quite some time, and you can throw yourself on the floor and start kicking your legs in the air and screaming if you want.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
Tom, now you're just starting to babble.
It is 10am & another busy day in Kevin's make believe school.
Originally posted by: tom
It is 10am & another busy day in Kevin's make believe school.
Just like Trump. When refuted, devolve to crude insults. He would be so proud of you.
I'm at the school right now! First class I teach is at 10:45. Did you ever go to elementary school, Tom?
The only thing "make-believe" is your fantasies about Trump. He's never going to kiss you. He's never going to go out with you. He's never going to give you a lollipop.
Originally posted by: tom
I would like the following questions to be answered, but they must be answered as a yes or no. No long winded non-answers allowed.
Are you in favor of packing the Supreme Court
Are you in favor of the filibuster?
Are you in favor of a nationwide mask requirement?
Are you in favor of no bail laws that criminals to go out & repeat their crimes?
Do you support the 2nd Amendment?
Are you in favor of fracking?
Are you in favor of the Green New Deal?
Are you in favor of illegal immigration?
Are you in favor of caravans of illegals being allowed in the country?
Are you in favor of illegals being given free social benefits?
If the Democrats tax increase does not bring in enough revenue, will you support taxes on the middle class?
i. Yes. Poor old DonDiego supports the procedure which is prescribed by the Constitution.
ii. Yes. Poor old DonDiego supports the procedure which is permitted by the Constitution.
iii. No. Poor old DonDiego would prefer mask requirements handled by States and/or municipalities.
iv. [DonDiego notes this question is misstated] No. Poor old DonDiego supports prohibition of bail dependent upon the circumstances of the crime, as permitted by the Constitution.
v. Yes. Poor old DonDiego supports any provision of the U.S. Constitution currently in effect.
vi. Yes. Poor old DonDiego supports "fracking" in principle; he would not object to limits on specific fracking instances with clearly negative specific environmental effects case-by-case.
vii. No. Poor old DonDiego opines the "Green New Deal" as specified by Representative Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Edward Markey is w-a-a-a-a-a-y too expansive and overwhelming to the US economy.
viii. Umm, . . . No. By definition "illegal imigration" is not legal; laws should be enforced.
ix. No. See question viii, above.
x. No. See questions viii and ix, above.
xi. No. Poor old DonDiego would prefer the Government reduce spending and taxation. This pretty much summerizes why DonDiego opposes most Democrat and much Republican legislation.
So in DonDiego's ideal world, the government would neither tax nor spend--it would be essentially unfunded and unfunctional?
Or does he approve of government taxation and spending for the things he likes and disapprove of government taxation and spending for the things he doesn't?
Does he subscribe to the conservative shibboleth that government is an inherently bad thing?
Does he truly believe that an anarchic society would be a utopia?
Inquiring minds want to know!
