Originally posted by: Inigo Montoya
Except Pelosi refused it, not Trump. Get your facts straight and pull your plug out, you're sounding very constipated and voice sounds high and shrill Karen.
What did Pelosi have to do with the Jan. 6 riots? You need basic education.
Originally posted by: Inigo Montoya
Except Pelosi refused it, not Trump. Get your facts straight and pull your plug out, you're sounding very constipated and voice sounds high and shrill Karen.
She is not in charge of security, as Congress has a Capital Police Board for that. There was talk initally of asking for support from the National Guard, but that was held off, until they saw the crowd actually moving to enter the building. Even so, Pelosi had no say in mobilizing the N.G, that was up to other individuals.
You are just going off of what Trump has stated when this whole Jan. 6 riot blew up in HIS face, and he was looking to shuttle blame off of himself and on to others.
Pelosi in no way refused N.G. support when it wasn't even her call. It wasn't Mitch McConnell's call either, if you are looking for another scapegoat.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
What did Pelosi have to do with the Jan. 6 riots? You need basic education.
Nothing, except that she was one of the targets, along with the VP. Some people just feel the need to defend Trump for his blunders, and look for other possible scapegoats. Nothing more, nothing less.
Multiple cars and buildings burining. police officers injured, but LAM and mark think this is protected by the 1st amendment.
One of the arrested rioters has a warrant for murder and attempted murder
I haven't heard Gavin N endorse any violence ...or call violent offenders patriots..,,or offer them pardons. If he did he would be as sleazy as the president Tom voted for that is now trying to ignite a civil war.
Tom voted for violence last November.
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
I haven't heard Gavin N endorse any violence ...or call violent offenders patriots..,,or offer them pardons. If he did he would be as sleazy as the president Tom voted for that is now trying to ignite a civil war.
Tom voted for violence last November.
Face it, Tom's an ostrich, with his head in the sand when it comes to Trump and January 6th.
I think it would be interesting to set up road blocks with DUI checkpoints so these peaceful protesters would have to show ID trying to leave the scene. Let's find out who they really are behind the masks.
Originally posted by: Brent Kline
I think it would be interesting to set up road blocks with DUI checkpoints so these peaceful protesters would have to show ID trying to leave the scene. Let's find out who they really are behind the masks.
The fact of the matter is that when some protestors turn violent, THAT IN NO WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM ABROGATES THE RIGHTS OF THOSE WHO ARE PROTESTING WITHOUT VIOLENCE. Fascist Trump just wants to sweep everybody up, because hey, it's California, the state he hates the very very most.
Here's the contrast, Brent. The Jan. 6 rioters were ALL violent and had murder on their minds. The BLM protestors were 99% peaceful and were just marching and shouting. The same with these L.A. protestors.
Assholes like stupid Tom think that just because someone sets a dumpster fire or throws a rock through a window, the First Amendment rights of the entire crowd are canceled, and the storm troopers can swoop in and arrest everybody.
Thank God stupid Tom isn't in charge of anything.
With almost daily riots all the usual suspects here have is a riot that took place 5 years ago.
it is fun watching this group twist themselves into knots trying to justify riots, defend violent criminals and is the fault of those trying to restore order.
Originally posted by: tom
With almost daily riots all the usual suspects have is a riot that took place 5 years ago
We consider violence unlawful. You, on the other hand, endorse and embrace it.
