Tulsi Gabbard

This isn't about Tucker.  It's about Tulsi.  She never once said they were weapons labs.  She rightly raised the alarm that they are Bio labs doing research on dangerous pathogens in a war zone.  What could possibly go wrong with that? Why is it even controversial to suggest those facilities need to be secured.  That's just common sense.  Typically democrats hopping on the Mitt Romney smear of Tulsi...wait...what?

Don't take it from me.  How about Robert Pope, the director of the program that funded them.

“I would say from every facility that we have worked with them in, we have confidence that as long as the electrical power is turned on and the people we have trained are present at the facility, the biosafety officers, that these pathogens are safe and secure to international standards,” Pope said. “Should these facilities be damaged by conflict, that could change.”

Some labs, he said, may hold pathogen strains left over from the Soviet bioweapons program, preserved in freezers for research purposes....“Scientists being scientists, it wouldn’t surprise me if some of these strain collections in some of these laboratories still have pathogen strains that go all the way back to the origins of that program.”

US official: Russian invasion of Ukraine risks release of dangerous pathogens - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (thebulletin.org)

Biolab does not equal bioweapons lab.

I guess if I tell our Libs that we have a factory in my home town, the Libs will come back and say that I'm claiming that there is bomb factory in my town.

You cant follow your own point.      Why is it dangerous to anybody if its not weaponized ?    

You cant say?   Neither can Tucker or Tulsi.    Thanks for confirming.

"Biolab does equal bioweapons lab"  if you say it poses a threat to the public in enemy hands. 

I never claimed thwe labs were dangerous.   The two dipshits serving as the subject of this thread did.   and you've defending them throughout.   

Because some bioagents are dangerous.  Was the Chinese lab a weapons facility?  Never once heard the term bioweapons when folks addressed that plant, and it appears that Covid was released from that facility.

Here we go again with the Lib double standard/double talk.

PJ, did Tulsi use the word bioweapons other than to say that she never used this word?  The answer is no.  Just Libs making shit up.

Boiler is way out of his area of expertise here. Penicillin is a bioagent. What matters is the use and intended use of bioagents, not the mere presence of them.

What our Cons are doing is definitely making shit up. There's a Russian disinformation campaign saying the Ukraine has bioweapons labs. This will be used as a pretext for Russian chemical and biowarfare attacks.

Mother Tucker and Gabbard (and others) took the bait and got all ginned up about the nonexistent Ukrainian bioweapons labs. Then our resident conservitards joined the chorus.

Jesus, conservitards are suckers. And they're helping to justify Putin's murderous attacks on Ukraine. Way to go, Boiler, we know whose side you're on! MAGA MAGA MAGA death to Ukraine! Don't forget to send Putin some flowers, Boiler.

Does anyone (other than me) recall VERY similar discussions about the Chinese biolab which likely released Covid?  Some said that the US was involved and supported this lab with money and expertise, and the US scientific leaders denied it.  Nasty twisted discussions like this happened.  We'll, it just so happens that the US was involved in this lab, and the US did support this lab financially.  The folks that had correctly addressed US involvment in this China lab were lambasted for spreading lies.  And now we are seeing the exact same thing happen with Ukrain's labs.

Here are facts about Garrard's comments from a Forbes article...........and you can tell that this writer has an agenda.

"In a two-minute video posted to her Twitter Sunday morning, Gabbard said there are 25 to 30 American-funded biological laboratories in Ukraine and called for an immediate ceasefire at the laboratories as they could spread dangerous pathogens.

Gabbard’s concern about the spread of pathogens is supported by fact—the World Health Organization called for Ukraine to destroy high-threat pathogens this week to prevent the spread of disease if a laboratory is attacked—but there’s no evidence of the U.S. supporting biological labs in Ukraine and the U.S. has consistently denied doing so."

Now, here is the entire article, where one can read how the writer twists the truth.  https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereksaul/2022/03/13/tulsi-gabbard-latest-to-push-russian-backed-conspiracy-about-us-backed-biological-labs-in-ukraine/?sh=23e81f725522

The WHO agrees that there is bad shit at a series of Ukraine labs.  The WHO argues that this bad shit should be destroyed before it is potentially released, intentionally or not, during this time of war.  This is exactly what Garrard is saying.

At no time did Gabbard call these facilities Bioweapons facilities.  It no time did Gabbard state that these labs are US run.  This is just bull shit spread by Libs.

Boiler supports the invasion of Ukraine and the murder of tens of thousands of its citizens. Because Tucker told him that there were bioweapons there. Sorta sounds like them Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, doesn't it?

Kevin is telling us that the WHO's advice on science should always be followed, except when their advice shouldn't be followed.

The WHO didn't advise that Ukraine should be invaded and destroyed in order to stop them making bioweapons.

You idiot fiction about the Chinese biolab that "likely released Covid" was old two years ago. Why is it "likely"? Is that code for "conspiracy theory without a shred of proof"? You have a very poor grasp of science if you truly think that.

Putin thanks you, my little Boilerchik.