Turdiffs--the bigly solution to everything

Originally posted by: LiveFreeNW

No. That would not work. The 12th amendment requires that anybody running for vice president be constitutionally eligible for President. 


No. Anyone who has already served two terms as President isn't "constitutionally ineligible." He can't be ELECTED President again. But there's nothing preventing him from getting back into the Oval Office in other ways.

 

MAGA has in fact suggested that way for Trump to get a third term.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

No. Anyone who has already served two terms as President isn't "constitutionally ineligible." He can't be ELECTED President again. But there's nothing preventing him from getting back into the Oval Office in other ways.

 

MAGA has in fact suggested that way for Trump to get a third term.


Interesting point. 

 

".....But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States."

 

It doesn't say "constitutionally ineligible to the elected".  You have a point. 

From CNN. Liberals crapped their panties again for no reason.  

 

There will be no war; no tariffs.  Expect some sort of a deal where the US gets mineral leases, and military bases. and Denmark gets money

 

 Greenland deal: US President Donald Trump says he has “formed the framework of a future deal” on Greenland after a meeting with the NATO chief Mark Rutte in Davos, Switzerland. He described it as an “infinite” agreement, without providing specifics. Trump also said new tariffs are no longer needed on European nations that opposed his ambitions.

Originally posted by: tom

From CNN. Liberals crapped their panties again for no reason.  

 

There will be no war; no tariffs.  Expect some sort of a deal where the US gets mineral leases, and military bases. and Denmark gets money

 

 Greenland deal: US President Donald Trump says he has “formed the framework of a future deal” on Greenland after a meeting with the NATO chief Mark Rutte in Davos, Switzerland. He described it as an “infinite” agreement, without providing specifics. Trump also said new tariffs are no longer needed on European nations that opposed his ambitions.


So are you saying that we shouldn't have taken the Turd's threats seriously?

 

Or are you saying that the blowback was far greater than he thought?

 

And Tommy boy ..it wasn't only liberals who objected to Trump's shit. You clapped your flippers together in glee. But not all MAGAs did.

 

Tell us, little Tommy. Should the Turd have handled this issue the way he did--with threats and bullying?

 

You don't have the balls to answer.


The appropriate analysis here is: TACO

Originally posted by: Dealer1

The appropriate analysis here is: TACO


So why hasn't anyone (among his numerous targets) told him, "Fine, go ahead"? Or implemented retaliatory measures that aren't canceled when Trump backs down?

 

I think at a minimum, the EU should close all US military bases on their soil, give US forces 30 days to leave with all their stuff, institute a tax of 5,000 euros on any US citizen entering their territories, and slap a 500% tariff on US goods. They should also announce that those policies will be rescinded once a Democratic President is elected.

 

Only one way to deal with a bully.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

So why hasn't anyone (among his numerous targets) told him, "Fine, go ahead"? Or implemented retaliatory measures that aren't canceled when Trump backs down?

 

I think at a minimum, the EU should close all US military bases on their soil, give US forces 30 days to leave with all their stuff, institute a tax of 5,000 euros on any US citizen entering their territories, and slap a 500% tariff on US goods. They should also announce that those policies will be rescinded once a Democratic President is elected.

 

Only one way to deal with a bully.


  Then they will never be rescended.....By not electing ( honestly or fraudlently) a DemocRAT , the US will never have to deal with a bully.

Originally posted by: David Miller

  Then they will never be rescended.....By not electing ( honestly or fraudlently) a DemocRAT , the US will never have to deal with a bully.


You're actually saying that Trump isn't a bully???

It is called negotiating. Trump starts off with an outrageous initial offer and negotiates down from there. 

In this case he wanted mineral rights and bases. If he started with that he wouldn't have gotten it. 

So by starting with I declare war; Europe panics & Trump comes away with what he wanted & Europe says at least he didn't declare war. 

 

Edited on Jan 21, 2026 5:50pm
Originally posted by: tom

It is called negotiating. Trump starts off with an outrageous initial offer and negotiates down from there. 

In this case he wanted mineral rights and bases. If he started with that he wouldn't have gotten it. 

 


Nonsense. Being a bully isn't the best way to negotiate. It's one of the worst.

 

And how do you know he wouldn't have gotten what he wanted by asking nicely and respectfully? Denmark used to be one of our closest allies. A fair deal could have easily been struck without all the "outrageous" crap.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now