Two Terabytes of interview data deleted by the January 6 committee

Originally posted by: PJ Stroh

PS - If you think January 6 is going to be a winning issue for Republicans going forward you have more TDS than any liberal.       By all means - play the tapes of the riots and cop beatings for AMerica all over again.   You can tell them it was Antifa or whatever stupid shit you want.   Good luck with that.     

 

Mike Johnson is already bailing on that plan when he found out Republicans were sexualing harrassing their star witness and those text messages would be made public.


The Democrat Committee said the were going to turn over 4 Terabytes of data, yet only turned over 2.2 Terabytes of data. Where did the balance go....including hundreds of interviews of witnesses that the GOP has since interviewed?  Data of those interviews weren't included in the report from the same people who claimed Joe is snappy.  

Originally posted by: Boilerman

The Democrat Committee said the were going to turn over 4 Terabytes of data, yet only turned over 2.2 Terabytes of data. Where did the balance go....including hundreds of interviews of witnesses that the GOP has since interviewed?  Data of those interviews weren't included in the report from the same people who claimed Joe is snappy.  


Make shit up if it amuses you.

Originally posted by: Boilerman

The Democrat Committee said the were going to turn over 4 Terabytes of data, yet only turned over 2.2 Terabytes of data. Where did the balance go....including hundreds of interviews of witnesses that the GOP has since interviewed?  Data of those interviews weren't included in the report from the same people who claimed Joe is snappy.  


Yes - I know.  You've pounded you fist several times on this thread now saying that.    And you used a right wing rag as your source.   And I used a fact checking site that directly addresses your source and story and says its full of shit.   And considering your Joe Biden Mney Laundering rant comes straight from a Russian Agent who has confessed to making it up....well lets just say your integrity speaks for itself.

 

But here's the good news, Boilerman.   Mike Johnson and Republicans want to spend the next year re-investigating Jan 6 so they can try and say it was Antifa or something.     THey can subpoena anyone they want and have them testify under oath.  So if you are convinced the little green men in the Deep State are hiding interviews from Republicans - they have full ability to interview anyone they want.

 

Happy trails chasing Bigfoot.  And I cant tell you how thrilled I am to have Republicans remind America what a scumbag Trump and their whole party were on Jan 6 and the aftermath.

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Where did the data go and why was it deleted?  Why did Sleepy have 23 shell companys that produced nothing and provided no services....yet shuffled $32 million around prior to being distributed to the Biden family?  Why didn't the DOJ invesigate even one of the 154 claims from 5 different banks that the Biden's were laundering money?  Are you guys crooked or just stupid?


Ask Laudermilk, are the MAGA Republicans still working on this? Maybe they'll come up with something in 4 years, but given their track record on this kind of thing, it's unlikely.

 

Why are you asking us to prove the Bidens innocent? Here in the US, you're required to prove them guilty, comrade, you should be asking the MAGA Republicans why they failed at this too. MAGA in a nutshell, screams and cries, but never gets any results. 

 


Boiler keeps parroting the accusations of a discredited Russian agent and demanding that we prove him false. We don't have to bother, and he's free to say that we aren't doing so for whatever reason he can dream up.

 

He's an old man, craving amusement, just like Davey Dog, and the more we keep him entertained, the safer the neighborhood kids will be.

Our resident Liberals are arguing that when Democrats control things and obstruct an investigation long enough, this proves that corruption didn't happen.  Why did they turn over 55% of the collected information?  Would one Lib answer the question?

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Our resident Liberals are arguing that when Democrats control things and obstruct an investigation long enough, this proves that corruption didn't happen.  Why did they turn over 55% of the collected information?  Would one Lib answer the question?


Why did something that was "reported" by a discredited Russian agent happen in...um...Boiler's mind?

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Why did something that was "reported" by a discredited Russian agent happen in...um...Boiler's mind?


Kevin never reads the links that I provide, and then claims that his ignorance of the situation is proof that I'm wrong.

Fact checkers read the Rupert Murdoch article you provided and said it was bullshit.

Hence my link.

 

But bullshit never stopped Boilerman.   See his numerous threads about Joe Biden's money laundering he got from a Russian Agent sitting in jail currently for confessing to making it up.

 

 

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Why did they turn over 55% of the collected information? 

It's not true.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now