PJ, I don't know if it violates the civility rules, but you saying that David was as dishonest as....Tom? Wow, that was cold.
PJ, I don't know if it violates the civility rules, but you saying that David was as dishonest as....Tom? Wow, that was cold.
Originally posted by: MisterPicture
PJ, I don't know if it violates the civility rules, but you saying that David was as dishonest as....Tom? Wow, that was cold.
I see Picture has brought his spoon to add to the pot...
Originally posted by: MisterPicture
PJ, I don't know if it violates the civility rules, but you saying that David was as dishonest as....Tom? Wow, that was cold.
Those two are equally dishonest--they both support a serial liar, tout conspiracy theories, and "interpret" statistics according to what they want to believe.
And they're both too cowardly to admit when they're full of shit.
Hey Tom--the next time you have a medical issue and you go see your family doctor abpnd/or specialist, don't believe them or do what they say, they might make a mistake; so what you should do is call Hannity and do whatever he says. Oh, and when they roll you into the operating room and all of those medical experts are wearing masks, set up on your gurney and yell at them that they should take off their masks because masks don't work. Or, maybe you should just take a big shot of ivermectin because I'm sure it will cure what ails you. Good luck.
Originally posted by: Dealer1
Hey Tom--the next time you have a medical issue and you go see your family doctor abpnd/or specialist, don't believe them or do what they say, they might make a mistake; so what you should do is call Hannity and do whatever he says. Oh, and when they roll you into the operating room and all of those medical experts are wearing masks, set up on your gurney and yell at them that they should take off their masks because masks don't work. Or, maybe you should just take a big shot of ivermectin because I'm sure it will cure what ails you. Good luck.
HaHaHaHaHaHa! Someone is not playing with a full deck.....
Originally posted by: David Miller
In sum, while job growth numbers may paint a rosy picture, the reality for many American families tells a different story - one of economic hardship and the necessity of juggling multiple jobs to make ends meet. This reality casts a shadow over the administration's economic achievements and raises concerns about the future direction of the nation's economy.---The reality of the numbers and the manipulation of the numbers by the current administration --- Misleading Job Growth: March’s impressive job growth of 303,000 is overshadowed by the reality that many are part-time positions, taken by individuals struggling with inflation and high living costs. Dual Employment Necessity: A significant number of Americans are compelled to work multiple jobs to afford basic necessities, highlighting underlying economic distress. Inflation and Living Costs: Persistent inflation, despite some easing, continues to strain family budgets, particularly for essentials like groceries, undermining claims of economic prosperity. Sector Imbalance in Job Growth: Most new jobs are in non-tradeable sectors like government, healthcare, and hospitality, which contribute less to economic advancement compared to the tech sector, currently experiencing significant layoffs. -
Employee Participation Rate is a far better measure of how American workers are doing. You'll never hear this data on CNN or read about it in the NY Times.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Employee Participation Rate is a far better measure of how American workers are doing. You'll never hear this data on CNN or read about it in the NY Times.
Employee Participation rate has been in decline since 1996...
Oh goodie ! - Tom's statistical source comes through again !
the exception is when Joe Biden took over in 2020 when it started going up again.
Experts will explain why this has to do with an aging population demographic that is retiring.
But Boilerman can explain to you why decreasing employee participation rate was such a horrible thing during the Democrat admistrations during that period....and why it was a no biggie during Republican administrations. And also why its horrible thats its increasing now under Joe Biden.
(Spoiler alert: the coming explanaition will take COVID into account during Trump's administration but not Biden's)
It was 63.1% under Trump prior to the worldwide recession due to the pandemic. It has not returned to that level even under biden's greatest economy & bidenomics
From my last post: (Spoiler alert: the coming explanaition will take COVID into account during Trump's administration but not Biden's)
Thank you, Tom !
Oh - and Tom's source saves the day again !
Number of retired people by year as measured by SS recipients
Tell David Miller to get his retired ass back to work. He's part of the phoney baloney statistic you're pointing too.
I've already schooled Boiler and Tom about that stat that they LUVVVV to flog--even though they don't even understand what it means. They, of course, have weaseled away.
