Again, the brain dead, Biden Administration caught lying - https://dailycaller.com/2023/08/23/us-job-market-revisions/
Again, the brain dead, Biden Administration caught lying - https://dailycaller.com/2023/08/23/us-job-market-revisions/
LOL!!!! The Daily Caller.
I don't consider this a lie. But Toad, is it government data, or not? Who reports the facts doesn't change the facts.
In the context of record low unemployment coupled with the Fed's record increase of interest rates it's almost unfathomable that we are not losing jobs instead of gaining them. But we are. And that's why republicans are crying about Joe Biden's age instead of his economy.
good luck countering that with the Indicted Avenger in 2024.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
I don't consider this a lie. But Toad, is it government data, or not? Who reports the facts doesn't change the facts.
And the Toad thinks Buzz Feed is a truthful source. He is a moron....
Originally posted by: Boilerman
I don't consider this a lie. But Toad, is it government data, or not? Who reports the facts doesn't change the facts.
Did I say it ws a lie, Cliff?
I was laughing at the source... and of course the idiot OP.
Next.
Originally posted by: Vegas Todd
Did I say it ws a lie, Cliff?
I was laughing at the source... and of course the idiot OP.
Next.
Well moron, your reply insinuated that the source was laughable with your asinine comment.
Originally posted by: David Miller
Well moron, your reply insinuated that the source was laughable with your asinine comment.
Don't you mean "Moran"?
Bwaaahaaahaaa!!!!
Yes, it is government data and yes--despite the source--it is correct. However, I'm not sure what you think the significance of the data is. The concept that a president is the only variable effecting job growth is silly. You do understand that even the reduced job number is still a growth of 3.7m jobs in those twelve months. How many jobs did Trump "create" in four years. Well, it was -3m. The only modern president, other than Hoover, to have a negative number. Again, to assume a president is the only factor effecting job growth is simplistic, juvenile, and wrong thinking which confuses correlation with causation. Numerous independent variables effect job growth in a complex economy like that in the U.S. But, if that is your standard, Trump was a failure only outpaced by Hoover; and Biden is doing great. Thanks for pointing that out to me.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/23/economy/us-jobs-data-annual-revisions/index.html#:~:text=America%20added%20306%2C000%20fewer%20jobs,labor%20market%20is%20still%20hot&text=US%20job%20growth%20during%20much,new%20federal%20data%20released%20Wednesday.
Originally posted by: Dealer1
Yes, it is government data and yes--despite the source--it is correct. However, I'm not sure what you think the significance of the data is. The concept that a president is the only variable effecting job growth is silly. You do understand that even the reduced job number is still a growth of 3.7m jobs in those twelve months. How many jobs did Trump "create" in four years. Well, it was -3m. The only modern president, other than Hoover, to have a negative number. Again, to assume a president is the only factor effecting job growth is simplistic, juvenile, and wrong thinking which confuses correlation with causation. Numerous independent variables effect job growth in a complex economy like that in the U.S. But, if that is your standard, Trump was a failure only outpaced by Hoover; and Biden is doing great. Thanks for pointing that out to me.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/23/economy/us-jobs-data-annual-revisions/index.html#:~:text=America%20added%20306%2C000%20fewer%20jobs,labor%20market%20is%20still%20hot&text=US%20job%20growth%20during%20much,new%20federal%20data%20released%20Wednesday.
Well moron, it is difficult to create jobs when there is a full blown pandemic in effect - did you factor that into your skewed rant?
