Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
Not for their families....And not for the RUssian economy. Nevermind the casualties - millions of able bodied men under 30 have bolted to other countries so as to avoid the draft.
Putin is keeping his fingers crossed that the anti-NATO candidate will win the election in the US next year and surrender Ukraine. And that candidate has your vote, right Boilerman?
Russia has a limitless number of people they will send to war, and that will not end.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Russia has a limitless number of people they will send to war, and that will not end.
No nation has a limitless population, and of a nation's FINITE population, only a certain percentage are able to serve as soldiers--and only a certain percentage of those will be willing.
Even dictatorships run out of warm bodies sooner or later.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Russia has a limitless number of people they will send to war, and that will not end.
Do you history homework and see why Russia ended their invasion of Afghanistan.
Hint: its the same reason they'll end the invasion of Ukraine (if we help).
But Republicans dont want to stick it to Russia. Remember when they screamed "cut-n-run" at Obama for ending the WMD hunt in Iraq? But when Democracy is on the line in Europe its the bone-spur-coward caucus that want to run with their tail between their legs. And we dont even have boots on the ground.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
No nation has a limitless population, and of a nation's FINITE population, only a certain percentage are able to serve as soldiers--and only a certain percentage of those will be willing.
Even dictatorships run out of warm bodies sooner or later.
When has a dictator run out of bodies?
Originally posted by: PJ Stroh
according to EU top general. Unless they get aid from America.
But I think Republicans already decided to surrender to Putin
What would Ronald Reagan say?
We should be 100% in or out. I prefer the first and Sleepy prefers neither.
The people you vote for are the ones holding up the funding.
And You just said you're fine with supporting or not supporting. You're the one having problems committing - not Sleepy.
Ukraine was winning until pro-Puitin Republicans cut them off.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
We should be 100% in or out. I prefer the first and Sleepy prefers neither.
It isn't up to Biden, fool. Congress controls the funding, stupid.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
When has a dictator run out of bodies?
1945, to give one example.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
It isn't up to Biden, fool. Congress controls the funding, stupid.
Sleepy won't send the best jets and other amaments, and if you'd been paying attention you would know this and more. CNN doesn't report such things.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
1945, to give one example.
Um, Russia won that war. Oh, and Russia lost 27,000,000 in WWII. They've lost less than 60,000 in this war. At this rate, Russia still has over 51,000,000 to sacrifice since their population is nearly 100% larger than in 1940. Kevin is correct that Russia can't sacrifice unlimited numbers, just 51,000,000 more are available. I know that large numbers confuse Kevin, so let's just say that Russia is willing to sacrifice 530 more for every 1 they have lost in this war. I call that unlimited. Kevin minces numbers.
