Unvaccinated brain-dead Trump-licking nimrods

Can you show me the article that demonstrates how the Kaiser Foundation is a bunch of liberal boogeymen?

Because I'm calling bullshit on that.

Kaiser Foundation

KFF  is a non-partisan source of facts and analysis, polling and journalism for policymakers, the media, the health care community, and the general public,^[3] and its website has been heralded for having the "most up-to-date and accurate information on health policy"^[4] and as a "must-read for healthcare devotees."

And I posted the interactive map of your home state that shows the raw data.    You can pull up similar charts for any state.   

And I'll be honest - this is kindof a boring argument.   We've had a full year listening to conservatives bellyache about masks, shutdowns, Dr Fauci,....and then scaremongering about the vaccine on their preferred media channels..not to mention their snake-oil alternative treatments.    And now you want to pretend none of that happend or has any impact on the people who listen to that crap?

Thanks for stopping by.

Wow pj posts their self serving description & calls them non-partisan. The kff is staffed by democrats & ex-obama people & contribute to the democrat party. They support all the liberal poistions. If they were truly non-partisan they wouldn't contribute to any party. 

So Lam, the original source for  the data I quoted was from Oregon & no counties are at 91%.  Also no counties voted 91% for biden. So stop lying. 

You referenced the NY Post on this thread...and you want to lecture about partisanship?    Why is it    Any time reporting refutes conservative bullshit they play the liberal boogeyman card?  It's lazy - especially in the context of no credible reporting to counter it

kaiser is used by every reporting agency in the country including Fox News, Forbes, and the AssociTted press.   The only people who call them partisan are lazy hacks who can't present a coherent argument backed up with facts so they undermine the people who do.    

tom's non-partisan QaNon media has spewing the same bullshit he has for the past year ...and now Tom wants to disown the fruit it's spawned.    People who listen to Tucker aren't getting vaccinated because Tucker tells them it's scary.   And that's why the data is what it is.     Sorry it's embarrassing for you. 

So you we still don't have a clue about their methodology.  Also PJ, I can't find your link from "my state" proving your point.

I posted my source - you can read for yourself - or you can hide behind your "liberal boogeyman" card.

I can care less.   I also posted the raw data on page 3 of this thread which you continue to run away from.     And here it is again https://www.coronavirus.in.gov/vaccine/2680.htm

And I sure as hell haven't seen your methodology.      So far you've given us your non-partisan research consisting of "your friends" and some other research you cant show us but we have to take your word for. 

And since you've demonstrated you dont know how to find the raw data as I've provided it begs the question of "what the heck are you looking at?'

  I'm happy to let those data sets stand on their own feet..and laugh accordingly.....as well as pointing out the liberal boogeymen at Kaiser had the courage to compile data at the county, state, and national level whereas you confess you did not.   

But like I said, Tucker and Hannity go on the air every night and scare their viewers about the vaccine.   I guess Boilerman thinks thats impacting liberals who dont watch that shit more than the conservatives who do.   I cant help you with that....I'm happy to point and laugh.

PJ, what does link tells us?  It tells us that the "very general locations" with the biggest Covid problem get the most vaccines. If you would be willing to comment on it, I will send you a 3.9 million person samples set which shows Chicago, and which of the 50 districts are the most conservative/liberal and which of the 50 districts are getting the highest percentage vaccines.  If you don't care to learn the truth, I won's post the link.

Kevin, I'll pitch this at you but I already know the answer.  You are never willing to read the facts.

Actually before I post this info, I'm looking for a promise from Liberals to explain the BIDEN/LIBERAL GOVERNMENT PROVIED DATA.  Radio silence expected.

3.9 MILLION PERSON SAMPLE SET.  ACTUALLY, 50 CHICAGO SAMPLE SETS BROKEN DOWN BY EACH DISTRICT ON A PERCENTAGE OF DEMOCRAT/REPUBLICAN VOTING STATS AND VACCINATION RATES.

No, I'm not interested in your cherry picked research from a data set of your friends and/or one municipality that you looked into.   My source had the courage to show their work on a  comprehensive national, state, and local level.   

And so did a host of other acredited reporting networks which I'm sure you label as liberal boogeymen.

Forbes

Wall STreet Journal

Politico

NY Times

VOX

US NEws

Washington Post

I cant help you with that.   So I guess its just a matter of who people want to believe .....the entire AMerican News community or Boilerman with his hidden research he did by himself with his freinds.

Have a great day.

Chicago voting results for the 2020 election presidential election and vaccination rates for each of Chicago's 50 wards.  That's cherry picked data coming directly to you from Democrats.  3.9 million people in this area.

Liberals put their head's in the sand when confronted with hard and unfiltered truths and facts.  I figured that you guys wouldn't read it so I don't bother.  Stick with your fluff.

Thanks, I will.   Me and the entire news community.