Mar 27, 2022. Its on Page 4 of the thread I linked to ...and you pretend you cant see. And I cut and paste your entire response so you cant backpeddle your argument about me taking it out of context. So what's next, Boilerman? The LVA boogeyman edited your posts - or are you going to continue to pretend you cant see them?
. You and everyone else who knows how to use the internet can read that thread in its entirety where I repeatedly tell you we can produce more from exisitng wells .... and you say we cant ...and how I dont know how the oil businees works...and how you and your friend know more than the oil ceo's who said the oppositte of what you did. And 18 months later the ceo's have been proven right...and you and your friend were proven to be full of it.
Again this is just one of your BS posts on the thread. What is the correct context of this BS post if its not arguing against getting more production from exisitng wells - which we now know they could do?
" Today's existing wells are producing flat out, unless they can't transport the oil to market in a profitable way. If one can't flare, that well must close. If rail/truck transportation makes the well unprofitable (because Libs wouldn't allow cheap pipeline transportation, the well shuts down. If transportation of the natural gas isn't allowed to move to market because there is one and only one method (pipeling), then wells shut down. You fucks obstruct th mearket and then claim that your obstructions don't matter. Then why did you block the pipeline? Why did you block flaring?
I understand why Kevin doens't understand a cost benefit analysis, because the public sector doesn't concern itself with such matters, but it matters when moving oil and gas in a profitable way to market."