I've always noticed that a dispropotionately high percentage of Liberals are confused by large numbers.
I've always noticed that a dispropotionately high percentage of Liberals are confused by large numbers.
I've always noticed that a disproportionately high percentage of conservatives don't know the standard English rules of capitalization. They're imitating their Tweeter-in-Chief, I guess.
This is why Liberals believe that the rich can pay for everything. My friend's Liberal mother is worried that she won't be able to make ends meet when she retires from her $14,000 per year job Jr college art job. She owns half of my friend's company, and her son's company earns her $350,000 annually as an S Corporation owner. I'm sure that she nooded knowingly during the PMSNBC idiocy.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
This is why Liberals believe that the rich can pay for everything. My friend's Liberal mother is worried that she won't be able to make ends meet when she retires from her $14,000 per year job Jr college art job. She owns half of my friend's company, and her son's company earns her $350,000 annually as an S Corporation owner. I'm sure that she nooded knowingly during the PMSNBC idiocy.
I've never nooded, but maybe Boilerman has. I guess he would be using his noodle.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
This is why Liberals believe that the rich can pay for everything. My friend's Liberal mother is worried that she won't be able to make ends meet when she retires from her $14,000 per year job Jr college art job. She owns half of my friend's company, and her son's company earns her $350,000 annually as an S Corporation owner. I'm sure that she nooded knowingly during the PMSNBC idiocy.
What?!?!?!
Originally posted by: Dealer1
What?!?!?!
Don't strain your brain trying to make sense of Boilerman's idiocy. He's drunk too much Trump Kool-aid, and he's beginning to babble. He has a persistent capitalization and word choice problem that he, bizarrely, seems to be proud of.
In other words, he's a typical Trumper--cognitive deficits and wacko, evil beliefs.
Originally posted by: Dealer1
What?!?!?!
Thank you for making my point.
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Thank you for making my point.
That point being that you say things that are unintelligible?
Theres an old saying that figures lie and liars figure. Both sides of the isle twist numbers to fit their narrative. MSNBC obviously F'd up on this one. In the big picture it's affects their credibility but I think the sides have already been drawn so the in the grand scheme of things it wont matter. Let it go.
Originally posted by: Rightdownthemiddle
Theres an old saying that figures lie and liars figure. Both sides of the isle twist numbers to fit their narrative. MSNBC obviously F'd up on this one. In the big picture it's affects their credibility but I think the sides have already been drawn so the in the grand scheme of things it wont matter. Let it go.
Don't fall in love with the false equivalence nonsense. Both "sides" are wrong in their reporting now and then. The difference between MSNBC and Fox News is that 1) MSNBC is accurate far more often than Fox News; 2) MSNBC issues retractions when they're wrong, and 3) MSNBC isn't a propaganda arm of a corrupt President.
The false equivalence argument has been a standard Trump tool since the horror of his Presidential campaign began. It's essentially the fourth grader, caught doing something wrong, pointing his finger at someone else and claiming, "HIM TOO! HIM TOO!"
If you truly think that the reporting of MSNBC is biased to the same degree as that of Fox News, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Breitbart, and all the other conservative propaganda sources---well, you've swallowed the false equivalence lie. Is MSNBC biased? Yes, to some degree. Do they get things wrong? Yes, occasionally. That isn't the same as the continuing lies put out by Trump's propaganda machine.
