We called President Xi, he said there are no reports of Walz eating cats.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

---

That "lie" was a simple misstatement and is utterly dwarfed by Trump's and Vance's avalanche of deliberate and ugly lies.

 

And by the way, Aaron, David clearly doesn't know this, as he calls everyone a LIAR LIAR LIAR LIAR LIAR at the slightest pretext, but a "lie" has to have two components, otherwise it's a simple untrue statement: the false statement has to be deliberate and made with the intent to deceive. Do you honestly think that Walz did that?

 

And yeah, baby, them heathen Chinee have placed a sleeper agent deep in America's heartland, where "Minnesota nice" meets kung pao chicken.

---

Originally posted by: Aaron

---

Totally agree, but since Walz lied about his service, he can't even be trusted with cleaning horse stalls. He's probably compromised and a foreign agent.

---

Originally posted by: David Miller

---

  The "deliberate and made with the intent to deceive"  statement does apply to liars such as Lewis and tampon Tim -- Here is a list of different types of liars, they Tim fits almost all of the 12 depicted here - 12 Types of Liars & How to Deal With Them -- https://www.wikihow.com/Types-of-Liars

---

Originally posted by: David Miller

---

 This is the definition of a lie -- lie -- noun a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth.

---

Originally posted by: MaxFlavor

---

Since Trump lied about the 2020 election, can he be trusted? Seriously so weak

 

---

Originally posted by: Aaron

---

We're talking about Walz here, you're creating a straw man fallacy.

---

Originally posted by: MaxFlavor

---

Trump is not a straw man, he's the Republican candidate for President running against Harris/Walz, so it's certainly relevant. 

 

HYou claim Walz can't be trusted because he lied, but Trump can be trusted because he lied. MAGA logic.

---

Originally posted by: Aaron

---

I never mentioned Trump in my original post.  You've derailed a post about Walz with a strawman argument.  It's like coming in here and saying, but Epstein didn't kill himself as your argument.

 

Let's talk about Walz and his stolen valor and his links to China.  He can't be trusted.  Why should we trust someone that lies about their service?

---