Originally posted by: MaxFlavor
Those are some crazy rules that you have, I think I'll ignore them.
haha, you could try working for the media. everything must revolve around 'orange man bad' no matter what the discussion is it has to be redirected to 'but trump'.
Originally posted by: Aaron
haha, you could try working for the media. everything must revolve around 'orange man bad' no matter what the discussion is it has to be redirected to 'but trump'.
I'll answer your quesion, you never answer my questions, but hey, I'm a lot smarter than you.
Aaron:
"Totally agree, but since Walz lied about his service, he can't even be trusted with cleaning horse stalls."
He earned the rank and retired before serving enough time, so his pension was reduced to his lower rank, is what I understand. Not a military person, so I'm really not sure how that works. Doesn't bother me at all.
Aaron:
"He's probably compromised and a foreign agent."
I'm not buying gold, I'm buying tin foil, and extra fluoride toothpaste.
Any other questions?
Would like to answer any of my questions in other posts?
Originally posted by: Aaron
We're talking about Walz here, you're creating a straw man fallacy.
Don't even know what a straw man fallacy is, do you?
Originally posted by: Aaron
haha, you could try working for the media. everything must revolve around 'orange man bad' no matter what the discussion is it has to be redirected to 'but trump'.
I agree that he should be ignored, but the sad fact is that he's running for Dictator For Life of the United States, and there's a substantial chance that he'll win. So we pay attention to him, like any oncoming potential disaster.
Why do you fight with David for the chance to suck Trump's dick? Don't you have any values or dignity?
