What A Blockbuster 1st Hand Witness Implicates Trump, Pence, Pompeo, Bolton, Rudy and Mulvaney

Here is a first-hand witness that conservatives have been pining for. Here is a summary of what he said.

1. There was a quid pro quo.

2. Military aid was withheld.

3. A state visit was offered in exchange for an announcement of an investigation.

4. Trump directed the operation from the White House.

5. Rudy directed the ground operation.

6. Trump didn't care about corruption at all. He didn't even want a real investigation. He simply wanted an announcement of an investigation so he could use it for political purposes.

7. All of the aforementioned people were in the loop and participated in the scheme or had full knowledge that it was going on.

The only question is are Republicans in the Senate going to endorse Trump's crimes? Most of them are telling reporters today that they have been too busy to watch the hearings and don't know whats going on in them. 

Yeah, sure. More lies, after more lies.

Yes, David, we know anything that implicates Trump or makes Trump look bad in the slightest is a lie in your book. However, the rest of the world thinks differently.

Another day, another corroborating witness under oath.   And the Bone-Spur coward tweets from under his desk.

Sun rises.

Like the proverbial broken record. Everything Stalker doesn't want to hear is a lie.

Perhaps he could tell us how, in his infinite wisdom, he can tell that all these statements made under oath by dozens of witnesses are lies. Really, how does he know? Has he been posting from the White House, hiding under Trump's desk, all this time? How can he refute the testimony of all these witnesses? Does he have factual evidence that they're lying?

Or is he just blowing smoke out of his ass?

So Trump's a crook....?

Who'da thunk it...?

So you are both full of it- who 'da thunk it...?

"So, you really have no testimony today that ties President Trump to a scheme to withhold aid from Ukraine in exchange for these investigations?" Turner asked.

"Other than my own presumption," Sondland said."

In addition

"You know what hearsay evidence is, ambassador?" Turner said. "Hearsay is when I testify what someone else told me. Do you know what made-up testimony is? Made-up testimony is when I just presume it. I mean you're just assuming all of these things and then you're giving them the evidence that they're running out and doing press conferences and CNN's headline is saying that you're saying the president of the United States should be impeached because he tied aid to investigations -- and you don't know that. Correct?"

"I never said the president of the United States should be impeached," Sondland responded.

The aid isn't the only quid pro quo. There are three of them.

1. The aid - Bribery & Extortion 

2. The state visit - Bribery 

3. The Arms sale - Bribery 

The witness wasn't able to provide a definitive yes or no on the first one. However, other witnesses have already done so. For example, on Tuesday, William B. Taylor Jr., the top United States diplomat in Kiev, told House impeachment investigators that the freeze was directly linked to Mr. Trump’s demand. Source

There is also an email exchange between Ukraine officials where they discuss that their aid is being withheld. 

Most of the witnesses have said they have never met Trump & all have said they have no direct knowledge & are expressing their thoughts & impressions. 

When asked if they think this is impeachable, bribery, extortion or quid they have all said no. 

And these are the star witnesses.