Originally posted by: Nines
Personally, as a fiscal conservative I'm a huge fan of cutting govt. waste / fraud / overspending; but there are some legal hurdles to jump in order to accomplish it / make it sustainable. Those hurdles might cause a major downshift in progress with the current push. Congress has to get on board with these funding cuts at some point or it won't hold up. The so-named impoundment powers of the president aren't enough without congressional legislation (SCOTUS said so in both 1975 and 1998).
A majority of the Dems here and in Congress are bemoaning the processes currently being employed. They conveniently forget that Clinton and Gore applied some of these exact same tactics when they were in power ( 1993 - NPR Act). Of course, the plusses from that initiative just seemed to wane and wither away over time despite good changes; plus that was 30+ yrs ago. Any of these so-called significant agency changes and cost - cutting measures might have short-term half-lives the way the annoying political pendulum swings back and forth in the US. Summarily, I'm a huge supporter of what they're doing..the cutting, etc..but they have to enact laws to back and sustain it.
But it provides fodder for spurious debate..obviously. Yipee-ti-yay...
Sorry. No.
Democrats never gave unsupervised access to people with no backgriound checks or security clearances. And certainly not to a contractor who has business with the government.
Musk's first order of business with his "cost cutting group" was to disolve the government agency that was suing his company. I guess that doesnt strike you as a massive conflict of interest and flagrant corruption?
Democrats initially were onboard with DOGE. Some still are. If Musk and his band of merry men want to make a good faith effort to find waste, fraud, and abuse I think everyone is onboard. So far the entire effort is to go after "woke", "DEI", and Trump's political enemies who had the audacity to hold him accountable for Jan 6. If thats the Republican's big plan for cost savings then it should be treated like the joke and corruption it so far has been.
I hope they find something in the Medicare/Medicaid/Military spending which is where the real meat is. The problem they have now is that they've already undermined their credibility. Even if they find legit stuff going forward it will be met skeptically. They brouight that on themselves.