Kevin's deranged hate for President Trump knows no bounds. Go ahead and continue your psychotic ramblings and baseless propaganda (Even though you promised to be leaving and no longer bless us with your ugly presence). You and your ilk are continually proven wrong once the real facts come out and your continual lies based on unhinged bias and misinformation only further demonstrate your true mental illness.
You're SO cute, Charles.
Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
You're SO cute, Charles.
I'm a lot of things. 'Cute' isn't one of them. Don't you ever tire of being wrong all the time? I guess it's on the the next hateful lie for you now.
Originally posted by: Charles
I'm a lot of things. 'Cute' isn't one of them. Don't you ever tire of being wrong all the time? I guess it's on the the next hateful lie for you now.
Angry toddlers are indeed cute.
You Kevin underestimate the devious actions and extent they (Democrat’s) will go to get a “non-lifetime politician” out of office.
so called second hand information is not allowed in court cases but is admissible to overthrow the President? Now that is so wrong on every count.
they once again have nothing.
We are back to this stupid argument were idiots argue their seat of the pants understanding of how the law works applies rather than the law as it really is.
1. The Bill Clinton impeachment was started solely upon the hearsay testimony of Linda Tripp. If that is your theory, Bill Clinton is owed a formal apology from the U.S. Government, reimbursement of his legal fees, and since it is so wrong on every count as you put it, Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham have to immediately resign as according to you they committed this very wrongful act.
2. The state department IG said the whistleblower account contains both first hand and second-hand knowledge. That makes your argument bogus.
3. The call summary was an official record of the government and not second-hand information.
4. Text messages on government-issued phones are not second-hand information. They are official records.
5. When Trump goes on TV and tells China and Ukraine to investigate Biden that isn't second-hand information.
6. When Rudee or any other member of the administration goes on TV and admits to doing something that statement is admissible.
Hearsay is frequently used in both Federal and State Courts. Matlock, if you want to talk intelligently about this issue, I suggest you read the Federal Rules of Evidence that explain what is and is not hearsay and detail all the exceptions to the hearsay rule. I have decided to kindly provide them for you here.
Our Trumper friends don't know about the law--and they don't want to learn. They have no conception of the rules of evidence or court procedures. All they're doing, therefore, is raving about how it is SOOOO WRONG that Trump is going to be made to answer for his crimes.
The inquiry that is destroying Trump is legal, just, and necessary, and is being done according to established rules and procedures. Fox News is bleating that the rules for such inquiries were changed. They were not.
What really surprises me is how credulous our Trumpers are. Fox News and/or some conservative wingnut pulls some unsubstantiated argument out of their ass, they immediately buy it and start trumpeting it to all and sundry. They'll believe anything if it might somehow benefit their hero!
I remain baffled that a horrid man like Trump inspires such slavish loyalty. Shouldn't any decent, thinking person realize that such a man is not remotely worth following? Especially now that his treason has been exposed for all to see? Trumpers, doesn't treason bother you? Don't you love your country?
The only true thing you have said is "I remain baffled"......
Stalker bleats on as Trumpie-poo goes (cue Johnny Cash) "down, down, down..."
What will Stalker do without a hero to worship? Hitler is dead, and Kim Jong-Un doesn't have access to Twitter.
