Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis
I'll weigh in.
First of all, the National Enquirer is several steps above the "news sources" that David considers legitimate, such as Newsmax, mxm.com (or whatever it is), Fakebook, Fox Nooze, etc. So don't worry about their fealty to the truth.
All that aside, I'm puzzled that this testimony is relevant to the issue at hand, except perhaps to show a pattern of behavior on the Orange Turd's part--? But everyone knows, and it's been proved beyond the remotest doubt, that the Turd is a crook and a shady operator. His campaign did far more egregiously wrong things in 2015/16 than pat to have tabloid news stories squelched.
Isn't the issue at hand simply: did he or did he not make that hush money payment?
That is odd, that you will weigh in on something......