I just love the way Mark throws the word CREDIBLE around. What do you find credible? Is it the fact that Dr Ford doesn't know when the alledged attack occurred? Or that she can't recall the year it happened? Or is the fact that she has no clue where it happened that lends crediblility to her claim? While I find her's to be a sympathetic case, CREDIBLE certainly doesn't come to mind. Perhaps Mark feels if he uses the phrase often enough, that it becomes true. It doesn't. What strikes me as credible is the assertion that the democrat party would do literally anything to stop this nomination. Before the hearing started, not a single democrat would vote to approve Kavanaugh......they would be eaten alive by their own party. And when the final vote comes, the only democrats that might vote for Kavanaugh will be doing it strictly to try to save their own butts in the coming mid-term elections. Personally, I want to see when the at risk dems vote. For example, will Manchin vote before Collins, Flake and Murkowski? Or will he weasel his way out and vote after he knows the outcome? Same for McCaskill and a few others.
I just hope that this circus foisted on us by the dems has real consequences in the mid-terms. That would add a real twist to the word JUSTICE now wouldn't it?