Yahoo censorship

Lying Liberal censorship that this site's Libs claim does not exist.  Your claims prove to be lies.

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Lying Liberal censorship that this site's Libs claim does not exist.  Your claims prove to be lies.


Boiler, when it rains on you, do you call it "liberal rain"? You're sounding like even more of an idiot than usual.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Boiler, when it rains on you, do you call it "liberal rain"? You're sounding like even more of an idiot than usual.


 And you, Lying Lewis, sound just like you always do - lying your ass off.

Boiler's dementia is convincing him that when one of two almost identical comments was deleted, it's a liberal conspiracy.

 

He burned his toast this morning. Gol-durn liberal toaster!


More Lyin' Liberal censorship.  This was rejected yesterday, not because it wasn't true but instead because it is true.

 

"I don't understand this after years of being told that Illegals don't get any government benefits and they are a boon for the economy. These santuary cities should be thanking Biden, Texas and Arizona."

Originally posted by: Mark

Who even spends time on Yahoo?


Mark, I get news souces in many places.  I want to see what's out there in the world, including news that I disagree with the point of the view of the writer.  Unlike you, I believe that news should be facts only and void of the writer's opinion(s).  Most articles which are called news are instead opionion pieces and in a newspaper that should be isolated to the "opinion" page.

 

It's obvious that Mark and Kevin only read left leaning news.  It's funny when the rest of the world knows about things like the fabricated Trump Russian collusion, yet they do not.  Why?  Because the news souces that you read hide facts that make Liberals look bad.

 

A wise man broadens his news horizons.

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Mark, I get news souces in many places.  I want to see what's out there in the world, including news that I disagree with the point of the view of the writer.  Unlike you, I believe that news should be facts only and void of the writer's opinion(s).  Most articles which are called news are instead opionion pieces and in a newspaper that should be isolated to the "opinion" page.

 

It's obvious that Mark and Kevin only read left leaning news.  It's funny when the rest of the world knows about things like the fabricated Trump Russian collusion, yet they do not.  Why?  Because the news souces that you read hide facts that make Liberals look bad.

 

A wise man broadens his news horizons.


Boiler, it's obvious that you only read "news" that agrees with your point of view.

 

It's called "bias" and prevents you from being objective. I suppose that's why you think that "Libs" are responsible for everything in the world you don't like.

 

Don't try to pretend that you read anything but the propganda you LUVVVV.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Boiler, it's obvious that you only read "news" that agrees with your point of view.

 

It's called "bias" and prevents you from being objective. I suppose that's why you think that "Libs" are responsible for everything in the world you don't like.

 

Don't try to pretend that you read anything but the propganda you LUVVVV.


And Kevin still assures us that Trump colluded with Russia.  Kevin laughed when Trump claimed this his campaign was be surveilled.  Kevin even tells us that chicks can play in the NFL, MLB, and other pro sports.  Kevin assures us that Portland is wonderful.

 

Kevin, or course I don't read everything, but Mark is laughing at me for reading hyper Liberal Yayoo.  I read from many sources and Mark and Kevin do not.  If it ain't Lib, you guys ain't reading it.

 

Shall I go on?

Originally posted by: Boilerman

And Kevin still assures us that Trump colluded with Russia.  Kevin laughed when Trump claimed this his campaign was be surveilled.  Kevin even tells us that chicks can play in the NFL, MLB, and other pro sports.  Kevin assures us that Portland is wonderful.

 

Kevin, or course I don't read everything, but Mark is laughing at me for reading hyper Liberal Yayoo.  I read from many sources and Mark and Kevin do not.  If it ain't Lib, you guys ain't reading it.

 

Shall I go on?


To answer your last question: no, you should shut up, permanently, but you won't. So you asked that question in bad faith.

 

Yahoo! is more conservative than liberal, actually. But you freak out when ANY source says something you don't like and then you shout "Lib Lib LIb Lib Lib!!!!!!!!!!!"

 

You have no fucking idea what we read and don't read, and you claim that you do know is just a variation on that tired old Boilerboob tactic of babbling "X says" or "Y thinks." It's stupid crap behavior on your part.

 

Oh, and your sexism shows when you refer derisively to women as "chicks."

 

I don't understand your babble: "Trump claimed this his campaign was be surveilled." You're going to have to attend my third grade English class if you want to be understood.

Kevin, you still claim that Trump colluded with Russia.  Explain what you read which leads you to that conclusion.

 

I read articles from Conservative, but mostly Liberal sources.  I can only conclude by your ignorance on certain topics that you only read far left sources.  This is not news, but instead agenda driven pieces which hide facts from the reader.

Edited on Dec 3, 2023 4:13am
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now