Jon,
The forum has 3 broad themes:
1. The handicappers think that handicapping angles are the end all.
They post their plays.
2. The market inefficiency experts study data/excel and find weakness
in WA lines. They won't post their plays.
3. And threads for which the most part are entertainment only. These comprise
a majority of the posts.
I am interested in #'s 2 & 3. I am very leary of #1 and consider most, but
not all, of those threads fish wrap.
Singer has/had tons of entertainment value. He has an unconventional approach to gambling.
The reader does not have to heed his advice. He is harmless.
What was uncalled for and gratuitous was the disclosure of personal info from the Maricopa Co. Recorder,
the lovely Helen Purcell.
What is a bigger problem are those who feel they have to read every post
and decide if it is appropriate for this forum.
As I said above, the really valuable betting angles, those with the highest edge, are not
handicapping angles. Rather they come from category 2 and include props, casino table games
and various qt's and halves. There is an extreme derth of those posts. It is that category where
several pro's derive their greatest income.
My vote is to call it tit for tat, have a suitable time out, and then bring Rob back minus the diatribe.
Thank you for reading this and enjoy your Sunday with those lovely children of yours.
The Mrs. & I are off to a buffet and the Bruce Willis movie.
Dr.Mikevegas
