This post is part rant and part hopefully informational.
For background, Barb and I are both Platinum in their new mLife system.
We acknowledge that we play there considerably less often and for lower stakes as we've transitioned from visitors to quasi-locals.
There have been a few recent incidents that have happened which will likely result in us completely breaking ties going forward.
First, as it's been said on this and other Vegas/Gambling boards, their mLife online site simply SUCKS. Specific examples....
1. Why don't they fully outline the terms of an offer instead of just providing vague details and say "call X to get specific details for your offer"?
2. Very few offers can actually be booked online. It's the gambling equivalent of shopping at Amazon.com but having to call them to place your order. I don't see much cost savings there.
3. The website has a "now you see it, now you don't" problem. Yesterday I open my account and it states "You have no online offers" or some similar language. The cure according to Barb is to sign out and quickly sign back in and voila! it worked. Is that really part of the system architecture???
The other issue is that they're sending out offers to way too many "qualified" people and then are unable to fulfill the demand. Specifically:
1. Barb gets a snail mail invite to the $75K Psychedelic Summer Slot Tournament @ NYNY in June via Excal. I email our host and wonder if I'm qualified as well. She checks into it and advises that not only did I not get an invite but that "corporate" has rescinded her offer. WTF???? When the host gently inquired as to why, the response was along the lines of "read the small print....management reserves all rights". Good customer service, right?
2. I get an email last Friday inviting me and a guest for a comped LOVE 5th Anniversary show. Within the hour, I email my host and about three hours later when she arrives at work she drops the reservation. The following night she comes back and says that it was sold out and that they only had 200 tickets. What dumb asses....if you had 200 tickets why not just send an email to each host across all properties and allow them to make an overture to their top player(s) instead of sending this out to thousands of "qualified" people and having to turn an overwhelming majority of them away?
I likley wound't get pissed if they hadn't sent the offer in the first place....it's very likely I wouldn't have known or cared about either of these. Offering them and then rescinding or restriciting their use does nothing more than alienate GOOD customers.
I know a number of people who work at various MRI properties. The thought process in general is that on a corporate level it's perceived that a host has little to no value and that customers are mailer driven. This may be true in some cases but not all. In my mind, it's a slippery slope. Decrease the cash back, limit offers, and downgrade games and you have CET (or a worse variant thereof).
I have been a MGM fan for the last four years; ever since I transitioned from HET after their castration of Caesars. Today, not so much.
My friends who work there will still be friends so nothing changes in that respect. My play on the other hand will very likely be going somewhere else.
These guys are really out to lunch. While I'm of the school who says "there's nothing like Vegas" when comparing it to our gambling venues, my opinion is likely not in the majority. When 8/5 BP is the new JoB on the Strip and the price of airfare and rental cars continues to outpace people's corresponding wage increases (whatever that is! LOL), people will opt to stay and PLAY closer to home. It's common knowledge that more and more states are coming on line and offering casino gaming to help bridge record budget shortfalls. There's a wow factor to Vegas that makes it a worthwhile destination at a specific price point. Exceed that and you reach the choke point for many consumers. While the hotels might not be as big, the entertainment options as cutting edge, current and diverse and the food options more limited, you can still find the same or better games closer to home. As Adelson is now finding out the hard way, it's still the gambler who's paying the tab for all these niceities.
I'd be happy to be wrong on my predictions here but I'm just not seeing it.
Dan
For background, Barb and I are both Platinum in their new mLife system.
We acknowledge that we play there considerably less often and for lower stakes as we've transitioned from visitors to quasi-locals.
There have been a few recent incidents that have happened which will likely result in us completely breaking ties going forward.
First, as it's been said on this and other Vegas/Gambling boards, their mLife online site simply SUCKS. Specific examples....
1. Why don't they fully outline the terms of an offer instead of just providing vague details and say "call X to get specific details for your offer"?
2. Very few offers can actually be booked online. It's the gambling equivalent of shopping at Amazon.com but having to call them to place your order. I don't see much cost savings there.
3. The website has a "now you see it, now you don't" problem. Yesterday I open my account and it states "You have no online offers" or some similar language. The cure according to Barb is to sign out and quickly sign back in and voila! it worked. Is that really part of the system architecture???
The other issue is that they're sending out offers to way too many "qualified" people and then are unable to fulfill the demand. Specifically:
1. Barb gets a snail mail invite to the $75K Psychedelic Summer Slot Tournament @ NYNY in June via Excal. I email our host and wonder if I'm qualified as well. She checks into it and advises that not only did I not get an invite but that "corporate" has rescinded her offer. WTF???? When the host gently inquired as to why, the response was along the lines of "read the small print....management reserves all rights". Good customer service, right?
2. I get an email last Friday inviting me and a guest for a comped LOVE 5th Anniversary show. Within the hour, I email my host and about three hours later when she arrives at work she drops the reservation. The following night she comes back and says that it was sold out and that they only had 200 tickets. What dumb asses....if you had 200 tickets why not just send an email to each host across all properties and allow them to make an overture to their top player(s) instead of sending this out to thousands of "qualified" people and having to turn an overwhelming majority of them away?
I likley wound't get pissed if they hadn't sent the offer in the first place....it's very likely I wouldn't have known or cared about either of these. Offering them and then rescinding or restriciting their use does nothing more than alienate GOOD customers.
I know a number of people who work at various MRI properties. The thought process in general is that on a corporate level it's perceived that a host has little to no value and that customers are mailer driven. This may be true in some cases but not all. In my mind, it's a slippery slope. Decrease the cash back, limit offers, and downgrade games and you have CET (or a worse variant thereof).
I have been a MGM fan for the last four years; ever since I transitioned from HET after their castration of Caesars. Today, not so much.
My friends who work there will still be friends so nothing changes in that respect. My play on the other hand will very likely be going somewhere else.
These guys are really out to lunch. While I'm of the school who says "there's nothing like Vegas" when comparing it to our gambling venues, my opinion is likely not in the majority. When 8/5 BP is the new JoB on the Strip and the price of airfare and rental cars continues to outpace people's corresponding wage increases (whatever that is! LOL), people will opt to stay and PLAY closer to home. It's common knowledge that more and more states are coming on line and offering casino gaming to help bridge record budget shortfalls. There's a wow factor to Vegas that makes it a worthwhile destination at a specific price point. Exceed that and you reach the choke point for many consumers. While the hotels might not be as big, the entertainment options as cutting edge, current and diverse and the food options more limited, you can still find the same or better games closer to home. As Adelson is now finding out the hard way, it's still the gambler who's paying the tab for all these niceities.
I'd be happy to be wrong on my predictions here but I'm just not seeing it.
Dan