814 Kst/xmen UNDER 151.5 3 weight

[QUOTE=Climate;19774]One thing I love about this site. A great bettor, Fezzik, having a leak pointed out correctly (I almost posted something similar myself), and then having the balls to admit it.[/QUOTE] Except that this is literally the first time any of my "leaks pointed out correctly" have been allowed to stay undeleted for more than a couple of hours. Anthony must be on vacation. I didn't even notice until now that Alf claimed K St -4.5 after every major book had moved to -5 after sitting at -4.5 for 4 days. No biggie though, we'll get'em back tomorrow. I'm on Baylor -3.5, Baylor un 145, and Duke un129.5. For the Saturday game don't forget K St -3 and my 4 STAR GAME OF THE YEAR on K St un143. Best Wishes!

Alf has always graded liked that which sucks because we really dont know how accurate the VI record is against a widely available line.

Widely Available?? [QUOTE=skrtelfan;19802]Except that this is literally the first time any of my "leaks pointed out correctly" have been allowed to stay undeleted for more than a couple of hours. Anthony must be on vacation. I didn't even notice until now that Alf claimed K St -4.5 after every major book had moved to -5 after sitting at -4.5 for 4 days. No biggie though, we'll get'em back tomorrow. I'm on Baylor -3.5, Baylor un 145, and Duke un129.5. For the Saturday game don't forget K St -3 and my 4 STAR GAME OF THE YEAR on K St un143. Best Wishes![/QUOTE] Unless you posted these plays earlier and I missed them, I'm confused by your comments about Alf and Fez posting games on the board at lines that are not widely available because tonight you posted Baylor at -3 1/2 and under 145 when it's now 4 1/2 and 142 and also Duke at under 129.5 when it's now 126. If you posted these plays earlier in the week and I just missed them, then I apologize for questioning your posts on here at less than widely available numbers.

[QUOTE=MobileBandit;19804] you post Baylor at -3 1/2 and under 145 when it's now 4 1/2 and 142 and also Duke at under 129.5 when it's now 126. [/QUOTE] He's no doubt being sarcastic, but sarcasm doesn't work well on the internet so he should lighten up.

Not Being Sarcastic At All [QUOTE=OldTime'sSake;19805]He's no doubt being sarcastic, but sarcasm doesn't work well on the internet so he should lighten up.[/QUOTE] If you're referring to my post as being sarcastic, you're absolutely wrong. There was no sarcasm intended at all. I was simply asking if Skrtelfan had posted his plays earlier in the week when his numbers were WA and maybe I had missed his post or was tonight the first time he'd posted them. If tonight was the first time he had posted them then his earlier complaints about Alf and Fez posting their plays at numbers not WA don't seem valid. Personally, I think Skrtelfan is a good handicapper and was going to follow his posts from tonight until I realized I couldn't get anywhere near the numbers he played...

I'm not angry, I'm numb............ I was betting in running wagering on some games tonight. I am beyond embarrassed to say during the Ky game, I had a 42-1 run (ok to be fair, about 5 bets were KY ML bets) and yet somehow managed to not win money today. 42-1. I have the documented print out. And I don't win today because I bet my )#*%)#*%#(%* on the Xmen/Kst under 152. AND Under 151.5. And team totals under. THAT is hard to #()%*#()*%#(%*#%* do.

[QUOTE=MobileBandit;19807]If you're referring to my post as being sarcastic, you're absolutely wrong. [/QUOTE] No, just to be clear, it's skrtelfan's post which is clearly sarcastic. Just look at the lines for Saturday's games.

[QUOTE=MobileBandit;19807]If you're referring to my post as being sarcastic, you're absolutely wrong. There was no sarcasm intended at all. I was simply asking if Skrtelfan had posted his plays earlier in the week when his numbers were WA and maybe I had missed his post or was tonight the first time he'd posted them. If tonight was the first time he had posted them then his earlier complaints about Alf and Fez posting their plays at numbers not WA don't seem valid.[/QUOTE] He meant my post was sarcastic. KSt was -4.5 or -4 all week but at the time Alf posted -4.5, by his own admission most books had -5. Handicappers can really game subscribers if they wait for a line move, in which case they either get a better line by waiting, or they can post the old line after the line move and say "shop around for a stale line."