Conley +9.5 pts+assists vs. chris Paul

Everyone who has posted in this thread, I understand your points. Out of greed and the fact that I work to many hour to figure out props on my own, I love it when this stuff gets posted. I have a slow moving local and I'll play his slow lines against what the Greek has up but this technique has not worked so far. Anyway, my question to you guys is what is The different from these props to the golf matchups that alf posts? If you feel strongly about posters not putting up prop bets then I assume you feel the same way in regards to the golf matchups, team totals, super bowl props, etc being posted on this forum. It has helped me out and I think because of the fact that I play these almost entirely with locals right now it's not gonna hurt anyone else. Happy easter everyone.

You guys are tough (collectively). Give us winners on one hand. Don't give away secrets on the other. It's up to everyone involved on this board, including the moderators, to decide how much they do or don't want to disclose/share. It's a balancing act with quid pro quos involved. I don't think anyone should be critical -- and I'm not saying that anyone has been, per se -- of anyone else for going either way. dcheng112, appreciate your contributions.

[QUOTE=anthony;20337]You guys are tough (collectively). Give us winners on one hand. Don't give away secrets on the other. It's up to everyone involved on this board, including the moderators, to decide how much they do or don't want to disclose/share. It's a balancing act with quid pro quos involved. I don't think anyone should be critical -- and I'm not saying that anyone has been, per se -- of anyone else for going either way. dcheng112, appreciate your contributions.[/QUOTE] What concerns me the most is people giving out false picks deliberately. I'm sure it isn't happening here but any well respected capper could do it.

Those here who can move a line with a pick could very well do this. I have no reason to think that they have or that they would, but the way I combat this is that I only tail a pick if I agree with the analysis.

[QUOTE=anthony;20337]You guys are tough (collectively). Give us winners on one hand. Don't give away secrets on the other. It's up to everyone involved on this board, including the moderators, to decide how much they do or don't want to disclose/share. It's a balancing act with quid pro quos involved. I don't think anyone should be critical -- and I'm not saying that anyone has been, per se -- of anyone else for going either way. dcheng112, appreciate your contributions.[/QUOTE] I feel you on this one. I agree, it is difficult to give info and contribute, but not give too much info, or too critical information. Personally, I've never bitched or whined with the mods or the cappers on this site because I know what you're up against, and I truly appreciate your info. I also know you need good contributions to make the forum work. I believe it's good to exchange info and contribute, as long as it isn't self-defeating, which in the small market stuff it easily can be. I already know many of the established handicappers know what they are comfortable disclosing and not disclosing. They'll talk about a lot of things, but no one discusses the details of models and methods very much, even on large market stuff. I have great admiration and respect for Fezzik, but he's not breaking down his football totals model on a public forum. I'm a little bitter right now admittedly because I worked with a guy for a few months recently on a project, and he always wanted to pick my brain for everything it's worth, and whenever I had a question about his specialty which was in an area of casino gambling, he consistently went mute and found a way not to answer my questions. I finally had to get rid of him.

With all due respect, no one here is moving lines in real markets by posting. A 1AM pick available at one book, sure. A golf matchup, sure. Any day of game (or close) side or total, no.