Fezzik March Tournament Selections, 847 1st pick 847 Ind St +1.5 2h 1 weight.

Fezzik did post 737 New Mexico State +6.5 the other day.

[QUOTE=tinfw17;51288]Fezzik did post 737 New Mexico State +6.5 the other day.[/QUOTE] he posted NMSU +6...line is +6.5 now

Yes, you are. If you want picks for every game, go flip some coins. Would you rather go 45-40 or 9-4? (The reason his record looks like he picks every game is because it's weighted.)

No play IS a play, strange as that sounds.

[QUOTE=anthony;51291]No play IS a play, strange as that sounds.[/QUOTE] right....................

Obviously, it would be much better for a good business model to have just chucked up 3-5 bets, who cares if I don't believe they have value.......... Last year in rounds 2-5 I kicked butt, but got cloberred round1. I'm fairly sure I will have several plays round 2 (opening rd is rd0). N M St is a great example of how the lines are too tough. I liked them, got the confirmation from a few other sharps and gave out NM st +6..........then Dr. Bob 4* 's Indiana......FOUR STARS! Meanwhile, I'm betting NIT over(s) 132 that close 136..........

[QUOTE=anthony;51291]No play IS a play, strange as that sounds.[/QUOTE] Oh really?

Seriously, there were a few totals that were off, but look at the tightness of lines Murray -3 was very good. After that, some sides moved 1.5 points. I remember 10 years ago where I literally had hundreds of NCAA tourney round 1 bets on things like Vermont +11 (closing 8). This year, I had very few bets, and almost all were ones I made the night lines went out...........or on key inj. info.

It may placate some to give the lines you played, even though they are no longer available.

I actually think it makes things worse. What good is it to tell all I played Murray -3-105, and -2-130? Then I'm seen betting The other guys +5.5-110.............etc.