Fezzik NBA Playoff results (draft), YTD weighted playoffs 24-6. 10-0 on 2 and 3 wght

I, I, I, don't know what to say. Actually, I should comment futher. I hope it's understood that we don't discourage record-keeping, we just aren't going to commit to doing it, nor allow all the rancor that often accompanies disputes over what's the proper way to do it. Fez wanted to post the record for his recent run, that's cool. Someone wants to compile something that encompasses a longer period, that's cool, too. We just don't want to have everything revolve around it.

I'm just tired of being past posted all over message boards 26-8 run? Crickets out there. 25-30 run? The donfishGeeseGordonCaps are out and about everywhere!

[QUOTE=Fezzik;21550]26-8 run? Crickets out there. 25-30 run? The donfishGeeseGordonCaps are out and about everywhere![/QUOTE] Have to love the wildlife references, especially the geese. Fezz, many people would rather see you fail than succeed. (Flipper told me that) Don't get a big head as I heard Adam Meyer is 29-2 in the NBA Playoffs so far this year. At least that is what the salesguy said who called me wanting me to buy Meyer's VIP package for 3 dimes!

[QUOTE=Kruger;21561]Have to love the wildlife references, especially the geese. Fezz, many people would rather see you fail than succeed. (Flipper told me that) Don't get a big head as I heard Adam Meyer is 29-2 in the NBA Playoffs so far this year. At least that is what the salesguy said who called me wanting me to buy Meyer's VIP package for 3 dimes![/QUOTE] Wow!!! I am not denying I said this to you Jim, but I don't recall saying it. If I did say this, it must have been back when Fezziksplace was around and there were all those bad seeds around always just waiting for the ones that posted plays to lose so they could attack like vulchers. Personally I rather see Fezzik win than lose for many many reasons with reason #1 being that we are friends.

Kruger's not saying YOU want him to fail, just that you said OTHER people would like him to fail. And you know what, there's a lot of truth in that statement. The nice thing about having this a PPV site, it keeps out most of the haters. Amen for that.

r Right! I just wanted to clarify that a bit more. I love Kruger! Just wish he knew it is okay to call me even if the big 12 is inferior to the Pac 10.;-)

[QUOTE=anthony;21518]I, I, I, don't know what to say. Actually, I should comment futher. I hope it's understood that we don't discourage record-keeping, we just aren't going to commit to doing it, nor allow all the rancor that often accompanies disputes over what's the proper way to do it. Fez wanted to post the record for his recent run, that's cool. Someone wants to compile something that encompasses a longer period, that's cool, too. We just don't want to have everything revolve around it.[/QUOTE] LOL--it was a joke (I guess it must have been a bad one)--God doesn't anyone have a sense of humor any more?

I was joking back. Then I figured it was a good opportunity to clarify again. Didn't mean to sound too serious.

It's nice to see that we can all debate different sides of an issue (any issue), make our comments, and still keep things civil and decent around here. Anthony and Fez have done a great job with this board. I would assume most people agree, or they wouldn't continue as members. Thanks guys!!! And a big thanks to all the regular contributors. I enjoy the selections, and the insight behind it.

Record Keeping Before I say this here is a disclaimer: I don't care if the hosting posters (Fezz and Alf) win or lose. I think they are both winning bettors going forward. I don't come to this site for their picks, I am more or less here for the cheap discussion, the local sports betting community, and the tax writeoff. 98% of the time their picks don't influence my personal betting decisions. That being said, I do think there are people who joined this site just for the picks. These posters are openly touted on the website, they are the main reason people join this site. It's your site, but I do think there should be some long-term accountability on posted plays. I can see how some of the critics in the past have cited selective record keeping when you are touting it when you are doing well and quiet when you aren't. You can be sure they will be back to dog when you are having a bad run and not keeping a record.