Heat/Pacers Game 4

Heat/Pacers Game 4 I'm still staring at +2 on the Pacers for Game 4 despite an ESPN headline that Wade is receiving treatment for his injuries. Whether it is injury or not he's just playing terribly. TrueHoops is all over him for his poor play playing in the pick and roll. Without Bosh one has to figure if Wade isn't 100% it is hard to figure how Miami is the favourite. What would be the rationale? Go back to the zig zag and the last game closed 2 to 2.5 so am I supposed to add a point get 3.5? So if I have 2 as the number I guess I'm supposed to figure there is an adjustment being made. Not saying the Heat can't do it----or really LeBron can't do it. LeBron and his high school team vs. the Pacers probably close to the same thing (okay that is hyperbole). And obviously Wade may recover and play a huge game. I don't want to say that won't happen. However, the Pacers are a pretty strong team. In fact courtesy of True Hoops we know their starting 5 is totally awesome and has huge +/- numbers. It was total decimation the other night. Got to think at this point they are actually the better team. Imagine if they were the better team at home at a screaming Indiana based stadium and you could take 2 points in the game. Doesn't it sound incredible and just so easy to win at sports betting? For those who like the Heat and I respect that opinion---but is this really a -2 game?
The part about LeBron and Wade having a huge game is totally bang on. The part about the Pacers +2...that is not so good. I was really surprised this didn't get bet down to PK but it stayed at 2, 1.5, 2 and I even played some +2.5 at game time at all of the books I saw----except one. I was able to get PK -112 and PK -114 at Matchbook so there was a subset of bettors and we assume the more sharp bettors if we believe an exchange has an efficient number that definitely gave you the opportunity to get on the Heat at much better than -2. When it all said and done what is "sharp"? 2 theories met and one of them was definitely going to be right---and I was just hoping both could be right.