Prof Meyer's NBA Side Play #2 -- 11/3

Prof Meyer's NBA Side Play #2 -- 11/3 All trends and systems quoted below can be verified on-line with the Sports Data Query Language (SDQL). [B]Oklahoma City –8' over LA CLIPPERS[/B] – Kevin Durant had a sub-par performance in his last game – a humiliating 120-99 loss as a 6.5-point home favorite over the Jazz. Durant had only ONE assist to go with SIX turnovers and he corralled only four rebounds. The favorite for the MVP will have his game face on here. In franchise history, the Thunder are 20-4 ATS on the road when they are off a loss in which Durant had fewer than three assists. More importantly, they were a sizzling 11-0 ATS in this spot last season, covering by an average of 11.4 ppg. They were 7-4 straight up, losing in Cleveland, Denver and twice in LA vs the Lakers. Also, the Thunder are 10-0 ATS (+12.7 ppg) on the road with at least a day of rest after a loss in which Thabo Sefolosha scored fewer than 10 points, 9-0 ATS (+12.7 ppg) on the road with at least a day of rest after a loss in which Russell Westbrook was NOT the Thunder's high scorer and 9-0 ATS (+6.9 ppg) with at least a day of rest after a loss in which James Harden had more turnovers than assists. As a team, Oklahoma City is 11-0 ATS (7.6 ppg) after a game in which they had fewer than fifteen assists, 7-0 ATS (+6.7 ppg) with at least one day of rest after a loss in which their opponent shot at least ten three-pointers and made at least half of them and 5-0 ATS (+10.3 ppg) on the road after a loss in which they scored more than 25% of their points from the free throw line. Indeed, the Thunder should be able to impose their will on the reeling Clippers. LA played the Spurs relatively tough on Monday, but they were only 8-of-16 from the free-throw line. One of the most revealing stats for a team’s character and passion is free-throw percentage and how they respond to game in which they shot poorly from the line. The Clippers are 0-8 ATS (-13.9 ppg) with at most one day of rest after a loss in which they shot less than 60% from the free-throw line. Eric Gordon did it all for the Clips vs the Spurs, shooting 10-of-17 from the field to lead the team with 23 points while chipping in 11 assists. This, however, is no reason to play on the Clips here. LA is 0-9 ATS as a rested single-digit dog when they are off a loss in which Gordon was their high scorer. They have lost these nine games by an average of 16.1 ppg and failed to cover by an average of 10.6 ppg. Lay the points. MTi’s FORECAST: Oklahoma City 109 LA CLIPPERS 88 As always, comments welcome. Prof Meyer
The Thunder have done well after losses. We know your mentioned trends all have zero losses so I won't find any hiccups but one has to consider the following: (1) Oklahoma plays tomorrow night in Portland. Do you put extra rest on a few of the key players so they are fresh for tomorrow's game against a better club? (2) The Clippers have to be desperate at this point losing 4 games out of the gate. If they are a 10 win team it probably doesn't mean much but if they are a 28 win team you have to figure this is a big game...it is the 3rd game at home in a row against a conference foe. (3) Davis not sure what to expect. If he is out and Foye is out the Clippers have no experienced point guard so it all sets up for more Clippers pain. If he plays, well, he's lousy most of the time so that sets up for a lousy Clipper night. But he is a bit of a lottery ticket on any night. But without him I can see Oklahoma even taking this game lighter. The Thunder might be too good for them for the Clippers to get the win but +8.5 and even +9 on Clippers is tempting. Can the query better place the Thunder for the situation they are facing?--ie on the road, 1st of back to back, 2nd night is a far stronger opponent by consensus and current record and under Brooks. Thanks for your contributions. I look for your analysis each day.
[QUOTE=Skeeter;31708]The Thunder have done well after losses. We know your mentioned trends all have zero losses so I won't find any hiccups but one has to consider the following: (1) Oklahoma plays tomorrow night in Portland. Do you put extra rest on a few of the key players so they are fresh for tomorrow's game against a better club? (2) The Clippers have to be desperate at this point losing 4 games out of the gate. If they are a 10 win team it probably doesn't mean much but if they are a 28 win team you have to figure this is a big game...it is the 3rd game at home in a row against a conference foe. (3) Davis not sure what to expect. If he is out and Foye is out the Clippers have no experienced point guard so it all sets up for more Clippers pain. If he plays, well, he's lousy most of the time so that sets up for a lousy Clipper night. But he is a bit of a lottery ticket on any night. But without him I can see Oklahoma even taking this game lighter. The Thunder might be too good for them for the Clippers to get the win but +8.5 and even +9 on Clippers is tempting. Can the query better place the Thunder for the situation they are facing?--ie on the road, 1st of back to back, 2nd night is a far stronger opponent by consensus and current record and under Brooks. Thanks for your contributions. I look for your analysis each day.[/QUOTE] Thanks for reading the plays and providing feedback. All your points are valid concerns. Certainly, the Clippers have a lot of ways they could cover this one. When I took everything into account, I think the Thunder are worth a play at -8'. If we get back-doored, then we lose. Simple as that. If the Thunder look ahead to Portland too much, then we might lose. I'm basing the play on what has happened in the past in similar situations. The Thunder want to be contenders in this league. To be a contender, you have to TRASH poor teams -- especially when your star is off a bad performance. If the Clips cover, it won't be my first loss. I would like to take this opportunity to re-iterate that I'm hoping that these games are between 55-60% to cover the spread. Perhaps even that's too optimistic. One of the big problems I have is customers reading the write-ups and then thinking, "How can this lose?" Then they overbet their bankroll and lose money in the long run. See my analysis of the Thunder in the first of back-to-back road games under Climate's NBA post for today. Regards, Prof M.
prof.. pm sent

Prof Meyer, When I first logged on here I read your stuff and said "HOLY SMOKES" this cant lose! It didn't, at least the ones I played. However, I must point out, this is for reading, and using for info. If it looks good, and it matches other info I'm getting then Bombs away. As opposed to "I've got this NFC 1 pm East Coast GOY" type of billboard. I enjoy reading your stuff, Thank You for taking the time!