Professor Meyer's 2010-11 NBA Futures

Professor Meyer's 2010-11 NBA Futures To read about the complete history of MTi's NBA Futures, use the link below: [url]https://killersports.com/nba_futures.pdf[/url] [B]5-Star Futures Play of the Year Orlando OVER 55 Wins[/B] -- The Orlando Magic continue to get no respect. They have gone over their season futures win total for five straight seasons. They won 59 games in each of the last two regular seasons, but their win totals line is significantly LOWER than it was last season. Perhaps it is their disappointing performance vs the Celtics in the second round of the playoffs after dominating the Hawks in the first round. Perhaps it is the fact that the Heat are getting all the attention this season. Whatever the case, this line is too low. First of all, the Magic should be extremely motivated to finish atop the standings in the East - it will be a race to the top between the two Florida teams. Orlando has an advantage because they face the Heat three times over the first five weeks of the season -- before the Heat's drastically revamped roster has had a chance to develop some chemistry. They meet on Friday the 29th in Miami - the Magic's second game of the season. If the Magic are getting significant points here, look for a big play on them from MTi Sports Forecasting. In addition, the Heat will have distractions in South Beach and will be saving themselves for the playoffs. Both Lebron James and Dwyane Wade know from first-hand experience that the regular season is not nearly as important as the playoffs. The Cavs were the number one seed in the East last season, yet they were eliminated by Boston nonetheless. When Dwyane Wade won the NBA Championship with Miami in 2005-06, they were "only" 52-30 during the regular season. Orlando has proven stars in the starting five and terrific back-ups, adding Chris Duhon and Quentin Richardson in the off-season. We love how J. J. Redick has grown and look for him to contribute quality minutes this season get mentioned for the sixth-man award. All of this and all everyone is talking about is whether the Heat will beat the Lakers in six or seven games. I just read an entire three-page 2010-11 NBA season preview and the Magic were never even mentioned! The Magic are a TEAM that has been together for some time now. Dwight Howard is only 24 (he will become 25 on December 8th) and he is just getting started in this league. In the off-season, in an effort to get even better, he worked with Hakeem Olajuwon on positioning, footwork and scoring. Dwyane Wade and Lebron James are getting a lot of press right now and this can only motivate and focus the Magic. The Magic should have their game faces on from day one. They should be on a mission. Stan Van Gundy has instilled ferocity in this team. Dwight Howard has been asked so many questions about the Heat by the press, he refuses to answer. Orlando very rarely loses to bad teams and they should rack up a lot of regular season wins. There has been a concentration of power in the East. Basically, there are three very good teams. Miami, Boston and Orlando. Atlanta, Chicago and Milwaukee should be solid as well. However, there are a LOT of very bad teams in the East this season: New Jersey, Cleveland, Toronto, Detroit, Indiana, New York, Philadelphia and Washington. Unless they suffer several key injuries, the Magic will never be a dog against these teams. With the concentration of power, Orlando has the potential to win a lot of regular season games simply because they face a lot of bad teams. Miami and Boston have nothing to prove and will be saving themselves for the playoffs. The Magic, however, have a chip on their shoulder. They feel disrespected, dismissed and overlooked. Barring major injuries, they will be an underdog in fewer than ten games this regular season. We don't how far they'll go in the playoffs, but they should finish with the top seed in the East and win more than 60 regular season games. Perhaps an even better play on the Magic over 55 wins is them to win the Southeast division -- 4-1 at some places!! MTi's FORECAST: Orlando Magic 64-18 in 2010-11 [B]4-Star New Orleans OVER 41 Wins[/B] -- The Hornets were 37-45 last season, but Chris Paul was out for 37 games with a left knee injury and Stojakovic had a lingering back issue all season and missed 20 games. Obviously, there is an assignable cause for this drop-off. Darren Collison was solid in Chris Paul's absence, but he is not a floor leader like Paul. Their win total this season, 41, is surprisingly low. Last season, it was 46.5 and injuries resulted in only 37 wins. Why is this season's line six games lower? Are they expecting Chris Paul to miss another huge chunk of the season? Unlike many of the NBA "experts" we love the addition of Trevor Ariza at the expense of Darren Collison in a four-team trade over the summer. Collison grew tremendously in Paul's absence and this allowed the Hornets to get a quality player for him. Ariza played in Houston last season and both starting guards there (Aaron Brooks and Kevin Martin) love to score themselves, as they were 1-2 in scoring for the Rockets in 2009-10. In New Orleans, Ariza gets to play with a pure point guard who will be looking to give him a good look at the basket rather than trying to create his own shot. Yes, Ariza had a career-low shooting percentage last season at 39.4%. However, he simply did not fit in to the style of ball played in Houston. He has a great first step and if he gets the ball when he is open, he will take the shot, or drive around a rapidly closing defender. Ariza should be ecstatic to play with Chris Paul and David West and, along with Marco Bellini, should blossom as yet another scoring option. Ariza also gives the Hornets a lithe 6'-8" defender that can handle the opposition's main scoring threat, whether it be a shooting guard or a small forward. With Marcus Thornton and Stokajovic coming off the bench, the Hornets can bring in "instant offense" when they need it. Indeed, this team is below the radar. They should be every bit as good as teams like Dallas, Phoenix, Houston, Denver and perhaps even San Antonio and they should feast on the weaker teams in the East. New Orleans has a favorable schedule this season. They get 22 unrested opponents, they get 9 teams playing the second of back-to-back road games (up from six last season), 9 teams playing in at least their third straight road game (most for them since 2006-07), they only play 9 games all season with no rest vs a rested opponent (fewest for them since 2000-01) and they only have one 4-games-in-5-days stretch all season. With the continued emergence of Marcus Thornton and a healthy Chris Paul, this team should finish well above 500. Their rookie head coach, 38-year old Monty Williams might just win Coach of the Year. What about the Hornets at 12-1 to win their division?? The Mavs (see below), Spurs and Rockets all are vulnerable. MTi's FORECAST: New Orleans Hornets 46-38 in 2010-11 [B]3-Star Dallas UNDER 50' Wins[/B] - The Dallas Mavericks had a futures line of 46.5 and 48.5 in the last two seasons respectively and they won 50+ each time, rewarding their backers. However, this season, they have a much tougher schedule and Jason Kidd is now 37 years old and will turn 38 in March. Over each of the past seven seasons, the number of back-to-back road games the Mavs had to play was in single digits. This season, they have to play eleven, which is the most of any team in the league. Young teams are able to handle this, but it takes its toll on older teams. If the Mavs got to HOST a large number of teams playing the second of back-to-back road games, things might balance out. However, in 2010-11, Dallas hosts only four opponents that are playing the second of back-to-back road games all season. No other team has fewer. So, not only do the Mavs play the greatest number of back-to-back road games in 2010, they host the fewest as well. Last season, in 2009-10, Dallas hosted FOURTEEN opponents playing the second of back-to-back road games and this was the highest in the league. A drop to only four is huge and should cut into their win total significantly - especially because the Mavs are a veteran team and will save themselves for the playoffs, much like the Celtics did last season. There is no reason to believe that Nowitzki will be better this season than he has in the past. In fact, there is evidence to indicate that he is on the downside of his career. Last season, he scored "only" 22.9 ppg, the lowest in six seasons. Further, last season was the first time in ten years that he averaged fewer than eight rebounds per game (7.7 boards per game in 2009-10). Similarly, 2009-10 was the first time since the 1996-97 season that Jason Kidd averaged fewer than 6 rebounds per game (5.6 boards per game in 2009-10). Rebounding numbers indicate passion and toughness. What is crucial is that last season, they had a very favorable schedule with regards to opponent's rest and their stats STILL decreased significantly. This season, they will be wondering why their opponents seem so young, so fresh and so quick. The answer is that Kidd and Nowitzki are a year older and they are going from the best schedule in the league to the worst as far as back-to-back road games are concerned. The fact that their Season-Wins line is HIGHER than it was last season gives us solid line value here. Take Dallas UNDER. MTi's FORECAST: Dallas 45-37 in 2010-11
My book has orlando 58 New orleans 39.5 Dallas 51 Bummer about the magic but the other number seem solid... Excellent write-up! Thanks for the insight..
New Orleans 'over' is a lemon IMO Market steamrolling this one 'under'. Carolina Panthers, same thing. To win as season wins, you simply cannot ignore a sharp market mover like this. The ONLY people betting this stuff (other than the Heat total) are sharps. Don't step in front of them. Professor, if there is one key trned on futures I'd implore you to follow: DO NOT GO AGAINST MOVES, AND IF YOU HAVE TO DO IT AT THE LAST POSSIBLE MOMENT........
[QUOTE=Fezzik;30860]Market steamrolling this one 'under'. Carolina Panthers, same thing. To win as season wins, you simply cannot ignore a sharp market mover like this. The ONLY people betting this stuff (other than the Heat total) are sharps. Don't step in front of them.[/QUOTE] One problem with the New Orleans is that Chris Paul has been unhappy with the off-season moves, or lack of the team to make any moves that show a real commitment to winning. All the Hornets moves over the last couple of years have either been cost-cutting moves (Okafor for Chandler, Rasual Butler's exit, and trading Morris Peterson and the 11th spot in the draft this year to save cash), or mismanaging deals for average players (Stojakovic, Posey, Peterson, and now Ariza [his contract and the way it's structured will cost the Hornets an extra $10 million next year that they could have spent next year on a free agent]). Now they've hurt their chances significantly to really improve themselves next year and try to keep Chris Paul happy. With two years left on his contract, he knows his team is probably not going to get any better, and that's why he's frustrated imo. He says he is ready to go, but all the evidence points otherwise. Off camera statements (ei. Carmelo Anthony's wedding comments, off-season trade demands, and an interview on NBA tv that showed the most uninspired interview on a team before the start of a season I've ever seen), front office instability and chaos, money strains(organization's effort is to save money unless it's to make a bad deal on a midlevel player), lack of bench players, low morale, not to mention Paul's knee makes this a clear-cut fade on season wins in my book. I chose to give them out as an under on season wins a couple of weeks ago. If everything goes perfect and they have no significant injuries, they may have a decent season, but to me they look like they are most likely headed for a subpar season (or worse). I respect you professor, but I disagree on this one.

[QUOTE=Fezzik;30860]Market steamrolling this one 'under'. Carolina Panthers, same thing. To win as season wins, you simply cannot ignore a sharp market mover like this. The ONLY people betting this stuff (other than the Heat total) are sharps. Don't step in front of them. Professor, if there is one key trned on futures I'd implore you to follow: DO NOT GO AGAINST MOVES, AND IF YOU HAVE TO DO IT AT THE LAST POSSIBLE MOMENT........[/QUOTE] A very sincere question: Then, should we just bet on the way the season win numbers are moving? What is the winning percentage of following this line move? Does this theory transcend all sports' season wins? Doesn't Ed's past record qualify him as being a "sharp" in NBA season wins? If not, then the "sharp's winning percentage" on season wins must be better than Ed's. Any idea on how well they do?
[QUOTE=Kruger;30873]A very sincere question: Then, should we just bet on the way the season win numbers are moving? What is the winning percentage of following this line move? Does this theory transcend all sports' season wins? Doesn't Ed's past record qualify him as being a "sharp" in NBA season wins? If not, then the "sharp's winning percentage" on season wins must be better than Ed's. Any idea on how well they do?[/QUOTE] In general, why not bet the way the lines are moving as long as can get value on the number? In the long run, it's the way to go imo. Smaller markets, however, are far less reliable than larger ones with respect to line moves, so you have to be careful. Yes, this is a horribly inexact science that is constantly evolving. As far as any lines or cappers' records, you have to keep your own records on these types of things. My advice (I'm not doubting Prof. Ed's record) is to[B] always keep your own records as these plays are released, and record the number and juice you can get at least a few units at when the play is released. Many times you'll find what looks like a winning record to actually be a losing one at the numbers you can actually get regardless of who you are talking about[/B] (again, I'm not pointing fingers at anyone specifically). Bottom line, collect your own records and make sure you can verify them as accurate, then and only then can you proceed.
[QUOTE=Climate;30865]One problem with the New Orleans is that Chris Paul has been unhappy with the off-season moves, or lack of the team to make any moves that show a real commitment to winning. All the Hornets moves over the last couple of years have either been cost-cutting moves (Okafor for Chandler, Rasual Butler's exit, and trading Morris Peterson and the 11th spot in the draft this year to save cash), or mismanaging deals for average players (Stojakovic, Posey, Peterson, and now Ariza [his contract and the way it's structured will cost the Hornets an extra $10 million next year that they could have spent next year on a free agent]). Now they've hurt their chances significantly to really improve themselves next year and try to keep Chris Paul happy. With two years left on his contract, he knows his team is probably not going to get any better, and that's why he's frustrated imo. He says he is ready to go, but all the evidence points otherwise. Off camera statements (ei. Carmelo Anthony's wedding comments, off-season trade demands, and an interview on NBA tv that showed the most uninspired interview on a team before the start of a season I've ever seen), front office instability and chaos, money strains(organization's effort is to save money unless it's to make a bad deal on a midlevel player), lack of bench players, low morale, not to mention Paul's knee makes this a clear-cut fade on season wins in my book. I chose to give them out as an under on season wins a couple of weeks ago. If everything goes perfect and they have no significant injuries, they may have a decent season, but to me they look like they are most likely headed for a subpar season (or worse). I respect you professor, but I disagree on this one.[/QUOTE] These are insightful comments and observations. I really appreciate the time you took to post here because readers of this thread can now make a more informed decision. I, however, knew about most of this and stand by my selection of 4-Star Hornets OVER 41 wins. We will see... Prof Meyer
[QUOTE=Kruger;30873]A very sincere question: Then, should we just bet on the way the season win numbers are moving? What is the winning percentage of following this line move? Does this theory transcend all sports' season wins? [/QUOTE] This are great questions. I would like to know the answers. Does anyone have results of futures when the line has moved significantly? I don't have hard data, but in my experience, the "sharps" aren't very sharp. In my history of betting futures, I have gone against the way the line is moving many, many times and won most of the time. As more evidence, My baseball futures were 5-0 this season: 5-Star Chicago White Sox OVER 82.5 wins 4-Star Seattle Mariners UNDER 84.5 Wins 4-Star Baltimore Orioles UNDER 73' wins 4-Star Washington Nationals UNDER 70' wins 3-Star San Francisco Giants OVER 82.5 wins Washington was the only one that was a bit of a sweat. Does anyone know which way (if any) the lines moved on these plays? I'm not going tell anyone what they are "supposed" to do. I'm just presenting an analysis and looking for intelligent feedback. I'm not at all insulted if someone has a different opinion/analysis. I won't be insulted if anyone passes on the Hornets or plays even plays them UNDER. If I was a reader of this thread, I would take in all of the quality, thoughtful, intelligent analysis and use it to make an informed decision about futures plays. I definitely would recommend that everyone read Climate's post in this thread. There is a lot of good information there. You have my 2010-11 NBA forecasts: 5-Star Orlando Magic 64-18 in 2010-11 4-Star New Orleans Hornets 46-38 in 2010-11 3-Star Dallas 45-37 in 2010-11 And you can download a complete history of my past NBA Futures here: [url]https://killersports.com/nba_futures.pdf[/url] ALL of the plays since 1993-94 are given as well as the lines at which they were made. Perhaps a "third party" could pore over these and comment on "going against the line move" and verify that the lines were widely available. Prof Meyer
[QUOTE=Kruger;30873]A very sincere question: Then, should we just bet on the way the season win numbers are moving? What is the winning percentage of following this line move? Does this theory transcend all sports' season wins? Doesn't Ed's past record qualify him as being a "sharp" in NBA season wins? If not, then the "sharp's winning percentage" on season wins must be better than Ed's. Any idea on how well they do?[/QUOTE] Kruger - pretty simple really - if you go against lines moves in RSW in almost all sports you will be crushed - the regualar joe does not bet this stuff - pro money moves it. No disrespect to Professor but he is a sports information service provider not really a stone cold bettor - he's not a pro punter so not really a sharp
[QUOTE=Prof Meyer;30876]These are insightful comments and observations. I really appreciate the time you took to post here because readers of this thread can now make a more informed decision. I, however, knew about most of this and stand by my selection of 4-Star Hornets OVER 41 wins. We will see... Prof Meyer[/QUOTE] Hey, that's what makes a forum. Best of luck.