Shooter's 1/13 CBB

803 Utah (+6) (-108) 1st H 803 Utah (+10) Game 805/806 San Diego St/UNLV UN 132 (-102) 807/808 Utah St/Nevada UN 145'

My point is that if you are posting other's plays the plays should be acknowledged as such. Don't you think your followers deserve to know if the plays you are giving out are plays you originated yourself or if they are plays you copied from someone else. I would think they would want to know the actual source of the plays to determine if they want to use them or not

Also on many forums/boards I believe that sort of plagarism without acknowledgement is frowned upon and generally discouraged

I don't understand what difference it makes. If Fezzik offers a pick I don't care why he thinks it is a good play. I only care that he likes it. Similarly, if people want to play what Shooter is playing, I don't think they really care why he is playing it. I'd rather see a writeup than an attribution of "who thought of the play first." More than one person bets a side, but it doesn't mean they're all ripping each other off.

OK--maybe I'm out of line here--I think it's an ethical question that should be answered by Anthony