Doesn't this game seem like the culmination of the the new school NFL and old school NFL?
SF= tough stubborn coach, pound the run on offense, conservative game plan, good special teams, hard nosed swarming defense focused on stopping the run and getting turnovers. This team does remind me of the TB bucs, or Balt Ravens in early 2000s, or Chicago Bears of 07.
New Orleans = pass happy new school offense, with an aggressive blitzing D susceptible to big plays (New Orleans D gave up 14 plays of 40+ yds leading the NFL). New Orleans attempted 662 passes on offense and SF attempted 451.
Some interesting stats in this matchup:
SF Off Rushing vs NO rushing D. NO rush D gives up 4.95 per attempt (2nd to last in the NFL) and SF likes to run.
SF Off 3rd down conversion rate is a terrible 29% conversion rate and NO D is great at stopping teams on 3rd down (33%)
NO Off Rushing vs SF D. New Orleans surprising ran for 4.93 per attempt in the regular season and SF D was #1 vs the run giving up 3.5 per attempt
NO Off 3rd down conversion rate is an unheard of 57% and SF D is at 35%.
my power rankings have SF (-1) but I understand the line at NO (-3.5) mostly due to New Orleans amazing 8-0 run ATS and and 13-4 ATS YTD. I agree with you and think the old school SF team slows down the Saints at home and wins this outright even though saying that means you have to swallow some vomit and back Alex Smith over Drew Brees.