Advice, Is this a bad middle

An example of what Members is saying is the MNF game Mbook has UN 48.5 -108, but UN 47.5 +109 ...... and a bit of UN 46 +130 a MUCH better way to middle our OV 46-110 bet!
[QUOTE=Fezzik;3979]Mbook has UN 48.5 -108, but UN 47.5 +109 ...... and a bit of UN 46 +130 a MUCH better way to middle our OV 46-110 bet![/QUOTE] Wish you would have posted that before the game. I would have saved some vig. :) And how did it not land on 48 in that SNF game? Middle one time!
[QUOTE=anthony;3944]I get the point, but realistically -- could lose ticket, second side could move before completing the tandem, book could go down or refuse to pay. Always risk, right?[/QUOTE] You know, some people will say your being a complete nit with that response, but to me, it's legit concerns. Trivial edges aren't worth pursuing if they entail ANY risk. To add to your list, there's also the "risk" that you'll be identifying yourself to a book as being an advantage player. Arbs come from whack lines. Everytime you hit a books whack lines--especially if you ONLY hit their whack lines--you essentially put yourself on their nit list. So, yet another risk to nominally riskless betting.
[QUOTE=members;3945]Yes, but all of those things are present with any bet you make online. So the only "risk" if you want to call it that is the 7. I know guys who bet and NEVER take the available #. Meaning a guy like Fez, Charlie J, Old School or TheDude: who are extremely confidant in their models should not bet WA #s. The very best originators I have seen (who win all the time) use the scroll to get a worse # at a + price. In most instances their "bad number" becomes the correct # but they are taking +1.37 + 1.52 etc etc. I have always said their are many ways to win at this. The example above is for a rare breed indeed.[/QUOTE] There are originators who win "all the time?" Anyway, getting past that nonsense, the scroll (assuming you're talking about the drop-down, alternative-lines), has no inherent usefulness unless you think the books are trading 1/2 points wrong. Which they aren't (although, back in the day, there weren't too smart about the NFL 3). EVERY SINGLE BET YOU EVER MAKE HAS IT'S OWN EV. And no other bet can change that first bet's EV. At best, a book should be ambivalent about which number/price any player takes. Meaning, as long as the EV remains the same, the bets are the same, in the long run. So, explain, please, how someone is going to get an edge using properly-calculated alternative lines? You're probably going here: you can bet more if the bet will end up risk-free at the end with a buy-back middle/scalp. But that's illusory in the real world. If you would normally bet 1 unit at the -110 line, but plan on betting 5 units at a big +price/worse spread in anticipation of a line move you'll buy back, your risk is that you'll be wrong on the line move. So you wouldn't be avoiding risk at all. Not to mention the costs of maxing out accounts with oversized bets (because we can no longer transfer money easily; because books boot, etc). If there are "originators" doing what your saying, this is what they're really doing: using the steam created by their followers to make money. IOW, they don't have risk of the line not moving the way they need because they're using their influence with schmuck followers to insure it moves that way. That's a legit tactic from their end, but it isn't a handicapping edge, it's a marketing advantage.

[QUOTE=Pachuca;3989]There are originators who win "all the time?" Anyway, getting past that nonsense, the scroll (assuming you're talking about the drop-down, alternative-lines), has no inherent usefulness unless you think the books are trading 1/2 points wrong. Which they aren't (although, back in the day, there weren't too smart about the NFL 3). EVERY SINGLE BET YOU EVER MAKE HAS IT'S OWN EV. And no other bet can change that first bet's EV. At best, a book should be ambivalent about which number/price any player takes. Meaning, as long as the EV remains the same, the bets are the same, in the long run. So, explain, please, how someone is going to get an edge using properly-calculated alternative lines? You're probably going here: you can bet more if the bet will end up risk-free at the end with a buy-back middle/scalp. But that's illusory in the real world. If you would normally bet 1 unit at the -110 line, but plan on betting 5 units at a big +price/worse spread in anticipation of a line move you'll buy back, your risk is that you'll be wrong on the line move. So you wouldn't be avoiding risk at all. Not to mention the costs of maxing out accounts with oversized bets (because we can no longer transfer money easily; because books boot, etc). If there are "originators" doing what your saying, this is what they're really doing: using the steam created by their followers to make money. IOW, they don't have risk of the line not moving the way they need because they're using their influence with schmuck followers to insure it moves that way. That's a legit tactic from their end, but it isn't a handicapping edge, it's a marketing advantage.[/QUOTE] Do not agree with just about anything you are saying as you are not responding to what I wrote or you do not understand it. I talked about originators who make their own lines and are winners. I thought the bettors I used as an example would help, but you may not know their long term success at predicting which way a line will move. Look at Fez response. Its pretty self explanatory. Another great example would be Ras or Helmut on their college baskets. Since they are correct in spotting the bad lines and knowing which way the line should move barring injury would it not be smart plus ev to bet more than their normal bet size at a not WA # at plus juice only to take back a plus price after the line move? As I stated its for a "rare breed" but they do exist-I have seen it. It happens right on this board-just look at Fezzik release points. Again, pretty east to "get it". Also, your point on betting bad #s posted at a book is not at all what I was talking about. In todays market I know of 3 places with a 4th on the horizon that I can say never kicked out a soul-Pinny, Match, cris and their new exchange.
[QUOTE=members;3990]In todays market I know of 3 places with a 4th on the horizon that I can say never kicked out a soul-Pinny, Match, cris and their new exchange.[/QUOTE] Spiro has booted a player? I honestly don't know that is why I ask.
[QUOTE=Pick 4;3994]Spiro has booted a player? I honestly don't know that is why I ask.[/QUOTE] Yes-a plethora but I did not mention him? Another great out that takes all-Grande.
If you have the nuts, is the higher return + price not the way to go? (even without considering hedging). As long as you aren't getting hosed on the dropdown box pricing.
[QUOTE=members;3990] Also, your point on betting bad #s posted at a book is not at all what I was talking about. In todays market I know of 3 places with a 4th on the horizon that I can say never kicked out a soul-Pinny, Match, cris and their new exchange.[/QUOTE] I wouldn't say those joints post weak numbers. Not that many places do anymore anyway, considering how clone it all is.
[QUOTE=members;3990]Since they are correct in spotting the bad lines and knowing which way the line should move barring injury would it not be smart plus ev to bet more than their normal bet size at a not WA # at plus juice only to take back a plus price after the line move? [/QUOTE] If the alternative lines are properly calculated by the book, than the EV is the same no matter which line you bet, +juice, - juice, it won't matter. If you can choose between, say, (-2' -115) or (-3 +110), assuming these lines are EV equal, then what difference does it make which you bet? Let's say you KNOW the line will move to -3'. Okay, assuming that, you're saying the originators (of line moves) will prefer the (-3 +110). Why? It would be just as easy and profitable to buyback middle the (-2' -115) as the (-3 +110). If the alternative lines are miscalculated, that's a seperate issue. But assuming they aren't, where's the advantage in betting a +juice number?