Anyone here purchase sharp football analysis?

I started playing his picks but jumped off the wagon. A few things I don't like about his service. 1. He has three types of plays (Personal, Computer ATS and Computer Totals). When one loses he promotes the other one hitting 60%. When in fact if you played all of his picks for the week you would have gone 50%-52% or worse. 2. He lays a ton of chalk. 3. IMO, he chases plays on Sunday night or Monday night if he isn't doing well. Like Fezz says there is NO CHANCE sharp or any handicapper will hit 60% or higher long term. My suggestion is buyer beware.

The touts love to give out several sets of plays, many at various units. Whatever set of plays or whatever unit rating is best, that is what they advertise. Plus, all the touts' records are inflated by at least 1% due to the way they are monitored. 53-54% is the best you can do if you include all your bets over thousands of bets. The big problem, of course, is that a tout that advertises that he has hit 54% will not impress enough customers to survive.

THIS SUCKS, EVERY TIME I 'find' a 67% guy, they start hitting under 55% when I look I must be the most unlucky guy on the planet.......or the world's biggest cooler. COOLER

[QUOTE=Old School;9927]The touts love to give out several sets of plays, many at various units. Whatever set of plays or whatever unit rating is best, that is what they advertise. Plus, all the touts' records are inflated by at least 1% due to the way they are monitored. 53-54% is the best you can do if you include all your bets over thousands of bets. The big problem, of course, is that a tout that advertises that he has hit 54% will not impress enough customers to survive.[/QUOTE] This is great advice for those new to gambling. I have made some mistakes following some touts but have found a home here at lva. No bull crap here and you can get great advice from true sharps. Good post Old School.

like I said way back on this post, forget anybody who has different names they put on their plays--------personal---computer etc. if you have plays,name the teams, like the shrink does on the podcast and the contestants do on the money talks show. like old school said,if you have many different names, one of them could do well, so that's the one you market, even if combined your plays are only hitting 50 percent

The Shrink's Wednesday Plays [QUOTE=JimS;9958]like I said way back on this post, forget anybody who has different names they put on their plays--------personal---computer etc. if you have plays,name the teams, like the shrink does on the podcast and the contestants do on the money talks show. like old school said,if you have many different names, one of them could do well, so that's the one you market, even if combined your plays are only hitting 50 percent[/QUOTE] Never mind. Grux posted them after I posted my request. Sorry!

This guy is worth 5 pages and 1800 views? Really? What a cesspool this business is ...

He is staring at 0-6 for the week, he has indy and the giants which may win. He had under cleveland,seattle,tbay,pitt, caro. Computer play on dallas....He has officially shit the bed

1-7? xxxxxx

Hard to beat 54%. Hell, it's hard to hit 54! That's over the long run. Everyone has bad streaks. If you add it all up, all plays, whatever they are called, it's hard to win over thousands of bets. That's vs Pinny, Cris, or Tradewind.