Anyone here purchase sharp football analysis?

[QUOTE=grux;16751]52.6% isn't awful compared to some touts. He just won't sell many plays touting a 53% winning percentage.;)[/QUOTE] Absolutely correct. I am not knocking the guy for hitting 52%. This was the first year he was monitored (The Sports Monitor) and he hit 52%. His methodology might be great. Don't know because I have never seen his work. The knock was he said he was hitting 67% for the first three years, I believe, with a good number of samples. Some on here have said he did that and he might have. But, that is not sustainable, if he in fact did hit that for the first three years. I have my doubts. That number is so hard to hit in one year, let alone three years. But, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. If he is a great handicapper, he will settle in the 55% to 57% range. Lets just see where he stands after being monitored by an independent source for about five years. If he is really good, he will be in the 55-57% range. There is no way he will be over 60% after the next five years. Nobody does that on a long term basis. Most who have dealt with him have said he is honest and I appreciate that. We need more of that in this business.

As I said above i am his customer and have seen him on forums. Before I bought last year when he started selling, I did go through his documented records online and they did check out. He did hit 66% in 2008, that is for certain. I can also verify his totals record for 2008 after week 10, which is when he started sharing them (not sure why he didn't give them all out year for free like he did in 2007, because I would have liked to see them) but from weeks 10-15 last year, which is when he said to follow, he hit 4-2 on his overs and 17-8 on his unders. Combined that is 21-10 just over 67%. Like I said, I remember looking back over his plays from 2007 which he has linked to each and every one on his site, and his record does check out. What I was most impressed with was his overs from 2007, which went 21-1 for 95%, and I did verify all of them. Pretty crazy but true. Like the guy above said, I really like his totals system, I haven't really seen any service hit at the rate he has hit. This year he went 25-17 for 60% and it was a down year. If you want to verify for yourself, i cant cut/paste because his site is locked but here is the link: [url]https://sharpfootballanalysis.com/Documented_Plays.html[/url] As others have said, the guy is honest and has won pretty nice in the past. I follow his totals more than anything because they have a better record but thats just me. I track him and Brandon Lang pretty closely, so I have good records on both. One to follow and the other to fade.

[QUOTE=Sixth Sense;16758]Absolutely correct. I am not knocking the guy for hitting 52%. This was the first year he was monitored (The Sports Monitor) and he hit 52%. His methodology might be great. Don't know because I have never seen his work. The knock was he said he was hitting 67% for the first three years, I believe, with a good number of samples. Some on here have said he did that and he might have. But, that is not sustainable, if he in fact did hit that for the first three years. I have my doubts. That number is so hard to hit in one year, let alone three years. But, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. If he is a great handicapper, he will settle in the 55% to 57% range. Lets just see where he stands after being monitored by an independent source for about five years. If he is really good, he will be in the 55-57% range. There is no way he will be over 60% after the next five years. Nobody does that on a long term basis. Most who have dealt with him have said he is honest and I appreciate that. We need more of that in this business.[/QUOTE] I agree that he will never hit close to 60%. I also question how he promotes his short term streaks, different plays etc. However, if you can filter out the crap he promotes, his plays may have some value.