Atlanta/Carolina Total Analysis

Atlanta/Carolina Total Analysis I didn't bet it under 48 but I do think I understand it. I have no opinions on it but perhaps this is a way to get a clue into NFL totals and Fezzik's model. He has been on the Carolina over a few times and was successful last week I know. With the help of this week's USA Today I did some fairly simple analysis which I guess you can only do after several games and feel free to hack away at it. (1) The real basic stats are Atlanta averages 22.42 pts per game and allows 20.33. Carolina has scored at an average rate of 24.16 pts per game and has allowed 27.0. The no analysis total then is perhaps an average of 42.75 and 51.16 which comes out to 46.955. If totals are set this way I certainly can assume sharp bettors will win at this by recognizing situations, injuries,etc etc. (2) I did a further analysis where I took Atlanta's 22.42 pts per game scored and that has been against a group of teams who average allowing 23.17 pts per game. So Atlanta at least on scoring pts (and if you are aware of all the situations where they should have scored more, shouldn't have scored any, the teams which were vulnerable, the fumbles at the 1 that won't be repeated, etc. you can make more of this number but I can't right now). However, I'm not surprised their scoring is a little below average. (3) What is more interesting is that Atlanta has allowed only 20.33 pts per game vs. opponents who average 23.17 pts. Now I do know that they faced Yates last week vs. Houston so this is a good example of a situation where the numbers are looking better because I obviously really need an adjustment from Schaub to Yates but I do think there is some swirling around that Atlanta's D has been pretty good. It would be alot better without their first 2 games of the year where they allowed more than 30 pts each. GB only got 25 and New Orleans got 26 and 3 of those were in OT. (4) Carolina has scored 24.16 against a schedule of teams that have allowed 22.94 pts per game. (5) The big difference is their D of course which has permitted 27 pts per game against opponents only scoring 22.076 pts. That is huge no doubt about it. A predicted score though might be for Atlanta 27/22.076*22.42=27.42 or 22.42/23.17*27=26.12. Let's call it 27 for Atlanta. For Carolina I might come up with 20.33/23.68*24.16=20.74 or 24.16/22.94*20.33=21.41. Let's call that 21 pts. That totals 48 pts. And let's just ignore that the predicted score doesn't match the point spread of the game. I think a few other issues are that the Atlanta games are trending low recently. The NO overtime game scored 49 but their D has held opponents quite low--granted weak opponents. But they've seen NO, Det, GB, Philly, Carolina this year and they have had 4 of their 12 games go over 47 pts including the first one with Carolina which scored exactly 48. For Carolina 8 of their 12 games have scored more than 47 pts including 6 of their first 7 games. From a handicapping perspective I think the fair line is around 47 or 48. It is tough to get this line to be something like 50 IMO so if one is staring at 48 as the total I think one might bet under based on this but I also think if you stared at 47 you might be over as there is some recognition that 47 and 48 are at least of some signficance for NFL totals. A handicapper has to like some of these Carolina games going over but another handicapper has to note the trend that Atlanta games are going way below these numbers. Another factor is that if a D is any good at all Carolina struggles a bit. They got 16 on Jax, 17 on Atlanta, 3 on the Titans. They got 38 on TB ( a noted weak Run D by many on this board0, 35 on Detroit (another weak run D??I'm not sure), 27 on Indy. You might get the angle to the under that if Carolina sees a real D they don't score as prolifically so that the average analysis I did above is flattering to them. I know one of my cappers hates plays released before hand to the public but you can see by the projected score I had that Atlanta would indeed cover the spread and I must say that fits with this pro capper placing a wager on the Falcons this weekend for more than his usual bet size.
Atlanta is an interesting team. Their defense does seem to be improved this year but last year, for example, their defense wasn't that good but their points allowed were pretty good for most of the year. The reason is they control the clock by running the ball an shorten the game. They would typically go on double digit play drives. Against Indy this year, they controlled the clock for about 36 minutes I believe.
Skeeter, your analysis is flawed IMO. Carolina averages 51 points per game. With a rookie qb. Now with injuries to the defense. Atl is a Joe Q average totals team IMO.......8 of clubs all the way. So what's the total? 51!!! wHEN A LEAGUE HIGH FLYER plays an average team, you CANNOT average the two totals. Juse like if Houston CFB played on 8 of clubs team, the total wouldn't bet 54+73 averaged, it would be 73.
I'm really looking forward to seeing this game, based on this thread.

I probably agree with you that the simple analysis or comparative analysis is flawed but I don't think that is the issue. That analysis gets you to 47 or 48. This analysis isn't the only analysis getting a total in this area. The market is there right now. Heck, Dr. Bob's projection on his website is 47. Is that representative of math models? I don't know but the world has a few ways of getting a total of 47 or 48 here. What is really interesting is your sharp play on the over vs. the small move down. The real analysis is in Frank B's and Sixth Sense comments regarding the Atlanta D. I'll add myself and just my opinion that the JAX and TENN games are interesting in that they are teams not relying on their O but strongly on their D to win and look at that Carolina doesn't score 30 pts on them. The theory to the under is that Atlanta is more fitting these style of teams right now than Det, GB, NO, etc. who Carolina played who are teams that scored at will and overall really haven't been that good defensively in some areas. It is just a theory it could be wrong but Atlanta might not be up to score a bundle and they might not allow a bundle. The total is high. Even this number is the 3rd or 4th highest total game for Carolina. Their average was 51. Well you got 48 to start. It is too close to their number. Their last game was 50.5 and came 48. Believe me I'm not against you on the play. Carolina seems like medicine for anyone with a struggling O. If Carolina can't run the ball, Cam will throw a few picks and maybe a few TD's, maybe another one of his usual meaningless TD's in the last minute they could score 60 here. The point of the response was just trying to figure out why someone might bet under 48.