Bookies Battle The PS. LOSERS! Week 14 [B]Last week when we matched up the top 5 bookies vs. the bottom 5, we got great results. The differences were 4-1 ATS. That would be a nice profit in anyones book!
So I thought I'd do the same thing this week and see what happens. Ironically, two of the "losers" used to be in the top 5 in former years. If I'm not mistaken, one of the two actually won the contest one year, or was very near the top. Soooo! Let's get started!!!
GREG HERZOG WILDFIRE RANCHO 85-105 LW 8-8
IND..OAK..CIN..NE...BUF..MIN..GB...ATL..WAS..NO...SEA..NYJ..DEN..SD...DAL..BAL
ED MALINOWSKI STRATOSPHERE 86-104 LW 8-8
IND..OAK..CIN..NE...CLE..NYG..GB...ATL..TB.....STL..SEA..NYJ..ARZ..KC....PHI...BAL
MICHELLE WILSON JERRY'S NUGGET 87-103 LW 9-7
IND..OAK..CIN..NE...BUF..MIN..DET.CAR..WAS..STL..SEA..NYJ..ARZ..KC....DAL...BAL
AL JACOME FOXWOODS(CONN) 88-102 LW 6-10
TEN..JAX..PIT..CHI..CLE..NYG...GB...CAR..WAS..STL..SF....MIA..DEN..SD...PHI...BAL
J. MORTON EAST CANNERY 88-102 LW8-8
IND..OAK..CIN..NE...CLE..NYG..GB...ATL...WAS..NO...SF....NYJ...DEN..SD...PHI..BAL
When we look at the differences this week, we have one game that really stands out, and that is NE/CHI. The top 5 bookies vs. the Consensus had CHI, and the losers had NE at a 4-1 ratio. This would be like a DOUBLE play on the Bears.
In the other games where the bookies picked one side and the "losers" picked the other, the differences are the losers picked WAS 4-1, DEN 3-2, and SD 3-2. These are the opposite of what the top 5 bookies played.
So, your bets this week would be CHI, TB, ARZ, and KC.
[/B]
