Defensive Explosive Plays

Defensive Explosive Plays Last year in the 2nd half of the season I posted a look at some of the defenses that appeared overvalued and undervalued by comparing a teams standard yardage allowed stats with that of their explosive play frequency. Impact plays such as sacks and interceptions were used to explain why certain teams like last years New England and Green Bay teams weren't as bad as cumulative yardage statistics would indicate. Winning teams (see Denver this year) often have these deceptive yardage stats due to play in the second half which often consists of their opponents being in chase mode. This works the other way too at times. I like to use the example of the Florida International team who ranked #4 in pass yards allowed in the nation in 2006. They went 0-12. No one needed to sling it vs them as they always trailed. They weren't good against the pass. They just had a lot fewer pass attempts vs them. Cumulative yardage stats can often be misleading if not put into context. Through week 10 these are the Takeaway and Sack rankings. Added up gives you their Explosive Plays Per Game number. The last column is each teams pass yards allowed and rankings for comparison. On the overvalued side are the Texans, Steelers, Jaguars and Giants. Of these the Texans and Steelers are clearly the most affected by their lack of Explosive Plays on defense. They rank #1 and #4 in pass yards allowed. Yardage wise you will hear the talking heads proclaim these teams as defending the pass well. Their lack of impact plays though add nothing to their stingy yardage totals. Fumbles are included in the Takeaways stat but I just as easily could have counted INTs only. A lot of fumbles come as a result of pressure on the QB so felt their inclusion can be justified. Undervalued are Cardinals, Ravens, Broncos, Cowboys After the last two weeks performance by Dallas, especially in the 2H of both games, it is tough to call them undervalued. They lose Sean Lee and the wheels fell off vs the Saints. Against the Lions they played fine for the majority of the game and then gave up 24 pts in the 4th quarter. The current situation there is not good so they are not a team I'm going to get bullish on defensively. The Cards and Ravens I'm OK with and the Broncos are a classic example of a teams generic pass defense stats being somewhat skewed due to the frequent blowout games they play in. Team Takeaway Rank Sack Rank EPPG Rank Pass Yds Rank ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arizona 2.2 3 2.9 16 5.1 6 243.7 20 Atlanta 0.9 27 2.1 25 3 30 252 25 Baltimore 1.4 24 3.6 2 5 7 239.7 18 Buffalo 1.6 18 3.2 7 4.8 9 238.6 17 Carolina 2.3 2 3.2 6 5.5 2 201.3 5 Chicago 2.2 4 1.6 31 3.8 23 249.8 23 Cincinnati 1.6 17 3 13 4.6 14 209.4 7 Cleveland 1.2 26 3.4 3 4.6 14 217.4 10 Dallas 2.2 6 2.4 21 4.6 14 313 32 Denver 1.8 11 2.9 14 4.7 11 287.9 30 Detroit 1.6 20 1.7 29 3.3 27 275.6 27 Green Bay 0.9 28 3 12 3.9 20 246.1 21 Houston 0.9 29 2.3 24 3.2 28 166.6 1 Indy 1.6 23 2.7 18 4.3 18 241.2 19 Jacks 1.3 25 1.3 32 2.6 31 235.9 13 Kan City 2.6 1 4.1 1 6.7 1 208.3 6 Miami 1.8 13 3 10 4.8 10 238 16 Minnesota 1.6 21 2.3 23 3.9 21 286.6 29 New Engl 2.1 7 3.2 5 5.3 4 232.8 12 New Orl 1.7 15 3.2 4 4.9 8 199.9 3 NY Giants 1.7 16 1.6 30 3.3 26 227 11 NY Jets 0.8 31 3 11 3.8 22 251.4 24 Oakland 1.6 22 2.9 15 4.5 16 246.6 22 Philly 1.7 14 2 27 3.7 24 306.5 31 Pittsburgh 0.8 30 1.8 28 2.6 32 201.3 4 San Diego 0.7 32 2.4 20 3.1 29 279.6 28 San Fran 2 8 2.3 22 4.3 17 211.4 9 Seattle 2.2 5 3.2 8 5.4 3 178 2 St Louis 1.9 9 3.2 9 5.1 5 237.3 15 Tamp Bay 1.6 19 2.1 26 3.7 25 237.2 14 Tennessee 1.9 10 2.8 17 4.7 12 211.3 8 Wash 1.8 12 2.4 19 4.2 19 274.8 26 I will try to put together a similar comparison come bowl season for NCAA.
That chart looked fine when I submitted it. Will try to put a link up to a Google Doc so it is readable.
bit of work went into this alright know what u mean with Dallas - only thing i do is bet dallas team totals when they are at home...for most part it has been solid gold
Good stuff, Frank, thanks!