Fezzik (and anyone else)- pct breakdown of weekly bets

I hope Jackie was not criticizing, just joking and complimenting the wife. Iceman may have been running bad, and his case is instructive. [quote=Iceman's blog]basically make around $200 a day and everything would be perfect.[/quote] Many people would not move to Vegas to hard for a risky $200 per day with no benefits. If you are betting online then it makes more sense to spend only a couple hours per day grabbing the low-hanging fruit to win $100 per day. [quote]I am now at 2.1% ROI since we moved out here to LV. ... 7,500 or so bets I made this past year (+157.5 units). ... I am hoping to win the neighborhood of 250-300 units of the 10,000 bets [next year].[/quote] This would make it viable. If he doubles his unit win and raises bets then he could get a little exponential growth of bankroll.

I'd pay 10 dimes for 10 mins with his wife... I love you Ice, keep pounding!!

What I mean by "teasers can sometimes be profitable without handicapping" is Wong teasers (I think that's what most people call them; NFL teasers in low-totals games crossing certain key numbers, anyway). Just looking at total/side combos isn't capping. The only way you can think parlays can be +EV without handicapping are if you think certain single-game side/total number combos are correlated (such as, maybe, low totals with high sides). Any other idea about correlated parlays requires handicapping. So, Sean and Ahearn, what are you guys referring to? I don't understand.

It's all about future expectation... It's speculation based on a few conversations with him, but I'd take Iceman's future over 99% of the board. And I haven't even met his wife yet. ;)

You said it - Wong teasers and correlated parlays.