Fezzik Hilton

I've said enough in just mentioning it... again, it is very simple. [QUOTE=hardrock;9371]then why don't you offer it. or be quiet.[/QUOTE] OK, now I'll choose the latter and be quiet.

[QUOTE=maximillion;9369]there is a much simpler explanation for the picks.[/QUOTE] I sure hope people aren't paying 25 dollars a month to listen to your dribble.

Clearly Fezzik is betting against the stale Hilton lines. All the lines have moved, This is a +EV system. Betting against stale lines is an absolute must.

[QUOTE=cowboys;9375]I sure hope people aren't paying 25 dollars a month to listen to your dribble.[/QUOTE] Cowboy... Absolutely no disrespect meant at all. You make excellent points and even touch on the true reason. Instead of getting defensive, take what was said and figure out what can be learned from it. It is worth way more than your lousy $25/month. Or, put my mindless dribble on ignore. Not trying to talk in circles, but I am not going to outright say it either. Use what you know to figure it out.

What he said [QUOTE=Old School;9378]Clearly Fezzik is betting against the stale Hilton lines. All the lines have moved, This is a +EV system. Betting against stale lines is an absolute must.[/QUOTE] I guess Old School is a little more direct than me!!

Wouldn't that support IceTea's contention even further? Not only are the selections just as accessible from the Hilton site at the same time, but they aren't even at WA lines that paying members can play. They're merely picks against stale contest lines, rather than original opinions. Obviously, this may not apply for every pick for every week (depending on the market), but if this is his methodology, IceTea's point at least has some merit as to the absence of actual insight (and thus, why thanks?). I'm not saying I don't find value in the site, as I don't regret purchasing a year's membership at all and do enjoy reading the posts here...I'm specifically referring to IceTea's point regarding the Fez Hilton picks, from an objective standpoint. Just as posters jump on each other for posting picks at non-WA lines, contest picks that no longer have value at WA lines are of limited practical use...and when not even posted before Hilton posts them, even less so

Sorry to be AWOL guys, busiest weekend of the year. CBB starting AND 50 games Friday. Money Talks. I couldn't post anything prior to being on, and compromise the lines I got in the contest. I let everyone know I was on air here, and my picks vs. the LeRoy's W.A. lines were put up here 20 minutes later: ILL-5 (lemon) Caro+1.5 still available Wash 3.5 still available Ne/Ind UN 50 will likely be available at 49.5 at post NE +3 (tough to find) Browns +11 (I'd wait, and try to get more) Rams +14 (I'd wait for this number) I'd make them all 2 weights. As for analysis, likely not going to happen on many plays, especially totals. Dr. Bob has KILLED himself telling WAY too many people about his methods, and now the copycats take out the value WAY earlier than him! This board is about a bunch of sharps posting picks, and getting value from them. Not about me. I'm just a moderator and contributor. Having said that, I will be sure to post my Hilton plays Saturday am going forward..... Ps. I'm getting a bad wrap on some of these "stale" lines. Many are available on Saturday, they disappear SUNDAY am.......Carolina, Wash are good examples.....and I expect Guys like the Shrink are going to come in on Philly pk'm tomorrow, and their were many +1 and 1.5 out there today AFTER you saw my Philly 2.5 play......do you really think I'm hooking an NFL '2' as the reason for the Eagles??? I would have grabbed them at 1.5. I did put up some bets today, and yes, some unfavorable choice of selections, and some bad breaks, AND some wrong sides......my apologies. As for sides, don't expect many college ones going forward football OR college. I'm becoming a totals specialist, I'm 100% convinced THAT is where we will make our money. Having said that, this board is going to have to bear with me in 09-10 to get up to speed on college baskets totals. In the meantime, may I suggest RAS or Helmut totals for those wanting to play with obscene edges this NOvember?

Point taken on getting a bad rap, Fez. Thanks for explaining. It's commendable that you address concerns of posters as directly and immediately as you do

And if it was so easy spotting 'off/stale' lines How come so few others are loaded for Bear with these lines also each week?

4-1 vs. the openers, 4-1 vs. the Closers....... 29-21. I know it's late, but we can make it if we run........