Fezzik's 2011/2012 football record

Good job by Fezz and Bob both. As for the CFL pick, I think we can fairly safely assume that Fezz bets and recommends betting every CFL pick posted by Londo. Not really a need to track them separately.

C Bob, I think you missed the 2 prop winners on the Dallas SNF game, but whatever (Anthony posted it in a separate thread). Too busy for this stuff.........carry on.

Wow, arguments about records and grading. I'm shocked! We'll let it go until it gets too nasty, then it ends. So if you're one of the I-absolutely-have-to-have-the-record guys, keep it within the boundaries or lose it completely.

[QUOTE=Fezzik;46314]C Bob, I think you missed the 2 prop winners on the Dallas SNF game, but whatever (Anthony posted it in a separate thread). Too busy for this stuff.........carry on.[/QUOTE] I did count them. They were both 1st Q bets, I tally as Qtr bets not props (even though they are props, I'll let folks combine my separate tally of props, qtrs, team totals to get a final #) Unfortunately, I also have the convention of picking the first bet suggested as the one to use for the records. Thus the Boyz +0.5 1Q won, but the 1q UN 7 pushed. Those who got 1Q 7.5 UN laying a larger ML of course would have won.

[QUOTE=anthony;46316]Wow, arguments about records and grading. I'm shocked! We'll let it go until it gets too nasty, then it ends. So if you're one of the I-absolutely-have-to-have-the-record guys, keep it within the boundaries or lose it completely.[/QUOTE] I certainly agree there will be arguments about recordkeeping. I hope to keep them to a minimum. I always welcome comments about any errors that I might have made. For those who don't believe in records, for God's sake, don't read my posts! Please ignore them all. The record of Fezzik's selections that I produce will, of course, NEVER replicate exactly any one individual's results. It should give a reasonably accurate estimate of someone who follows every bet and makes them in a timely fashion. I do believe the record can be one aspect of evaluation for folks to make of the site's benefits. IMHO, in no way should it be the only element that a subscriber evaluates.

[QUOTE=ComptrBob;46466]I certainly agree there will be arguments about recordkeeping. I hope to keep them to a minimum. I always welcome comments about any errors that I might have made. For those who don't believe in records, for God's sake, don't read my posts! Please ignore them all. The record of Fezzik's selections that I produce will, of course, NEVER replicate exactly any one individual's results. It should give a reasonably accurate estimate of someone who follows every bet and makes them in a timely fashion. I do believe the record can be one aspect of evaluation for folks to make of the site's benefits. IMHO, in no way should it be the only element that a subscriber evaluates.[/QUOTE] :D You are the man!

Summary through Monday, Sept. 19 (RSW total bets will be handled (till end of the season) in a separate thread): W/L: Half-wgt: 0-0, One-wgt: 26-33-4, Two-wgt: 16-15-0, Three-wgt: 6-3-0, Four-wgt: 0-1-0 Overall weighted W/L: 76-76-6, 50.0%, -8.70u Overall sides/totals unweighted W/L: 48-52-5, 48.0% Overall teasers unweighted W/L: 1-1 NFL Regular season record: 53-39, 57.6%, (31-27-3 unweighted), +8.30u CFB record: 18-25, 41.9%, (13-18-1 unweighted), -9.65u NFLX record: 4-7-1 unweighted, -7.35u

Just read the thread, I think Bob has been exceedingly impartial and fair with every bet he graded.

[QUOTE=ComptrBob;46466]I certainly agree there will be arguments about recordkeeping. I hope to keep them to a minimum. I always welcome comments about any errors that I might have made. For those who don't believe in records, for God's sake, don't read my posts! Please ignore them all. The record of Fezzik's selections that I produce will, of course, NEVER replicate exactly any one individual's results. It should give a reasonably accurate estimate of someone who follows every bet and makes them in a timely fashion. I do believe the record can be one aspect of evaluation for folks to make of the site's benefits. IMHO, in no way should it be the only element that a subscriber evaluates.[/QUOTE] Very well stated--ignoring accurate record keeping seems to be a defense mechanism of some type--thanks for all your efforts

ComptrBob's statement is well put. I'm cool with it.